racingwild
Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
- Messages
- 71
- Reaction score
- 0
Just My opionion, but that '03 doesn't look like her handwritting. I definently think someone added that.
Why would Cindy lie that it was written in 2005 when you can see it`s from 2003? Besides, she corrected the year. Is it possible that she just remembered the year wrong, as people would think if it were someone else than Cindy.
Thanks for the links. I have been thinking about this diary, the red ink, the missing pages and the paper found in the car written in red ink and the notes that were taken from Caylee's room (read it in one of the threads but don't have the link.) ( If I am wrong please correct me). My assumption and conclusion is this. If the paper in the car or the notes found in Caylee's room matches the paper out of the diary or even the ink used in the entry of the diary then LE has made a connection and the entry was written in 08. It would not be uncommon for someone to have started a diary in an earlier year and added entries in the future. So, a paper and ink analysis would prove when the entry was made I would think....
If the date is '03, WHY did Cindy claim it was 2005 on LKL? More lies?
At the request of JWG, I am posting the following images.
Left Side Photo Image
Right Side Photo Image
Full Photo
Center
Your idea is great but I'm pretty sure that the last time Cindy and George were on LKL their lawyer told Cindy that he is in posession of the diary. If that is true then we know no one is doing any analysis or tests. Sad, huh?
I have a lot of trouble with the confusion with dates with this family. I keep a calendar of events for my family. I need to keep track of who does what, when. Im sure some of us keep a note, if not on a calendar, somewhere, for something as mundane as a menstrual cycle. The fact that the June 9th and June 16th were confused bewilders me. Yes, its true that one can forget what date a holiday falls on but a quick look at the calendar will advise you of the proper date. How long and how many people went with the June 9th date? IMO, one day is too much. Why not glance at a calendar for something as monumental as this. I can't think of anything that would be more important than a missing baby, my baby! With that said, it appears to me that they forget a lot. The day, the date, the year. Caylee needed child care, whether it be CK, CA or Zanni, really doesnt matter at all who it was. Did they not jot this all down somewhere, to keep track of who, what and where and when? Was this all left for the last minute? I truly dont think so. As for the diary, CA was quite adamant as to the year. Why? Sure, she could have misspoke but IMO, she knew exactly where she was going with this. Too many date mix ups for me.
imo those two words do not beloing in the same post.I think she just screwed up, made an honest mistake. But it's Cindy so who knows!?!?! :crazy:
This is what I was wondering too...if anyone should know the date on the diary you would think that Cindy would...'03 was clearly written on the page opposite of the entry in question. Maybe it is an issue of them not being able to keep all the lies straight ? Maybe the date on the diary is just another one of their "mistruths".
Wouldn't you have to be an honest person to make an HONEST mistake?
Since we now know that BC has the diary, LE must not be conducting any writing, ink analysis on it, right ? I don't understand why they didn't take the diary, at least they could have had the FBI do ink analysis to try and get a time frame for the entry and the '03 written.Your idea is great but I'm pretty sure that the last time Cindy and George were on LKL their lawyer told Cindy that he is in posession of the diary. If that is true then we know no one is doing any analysis or tests. Sad, huh?
I wondered about that also---but I wondered more as to why BC has it and why CA gave him that ugly look when he said LE could have it.
Maybe, but what for?