Thanks for the suggestions singularity but I've read the transcripts several times over. What point is it that you are trying to make?
No offense but I'm not going to run in circles on this issue. You know what point I was making based on your two previous posts in this thread.
I'm missing the part that says LE didn't know the order of the photos. :thinking:
BBM: with due respect, the sequence would be the order in which the photos were taken. LE knew or could easily find out the order in which the photos came off the roll of film.
I wasn't
trying to make a point. I did make a point. A very simple one I might add. There's no room for confusion on the issue. They weren't well prepared during the questioning and flubbed the subject of the photographs. Period. If you've read the transcripts several times, you know this already. Even if you haven't read them, the excerpt was posted on the previous page and then again by me. I made my point, you disagreed(and that's fine), I state it again, you're missing a part, I post the excerpt(again), then you ask what my point was.
I hope this post isn't coming off too negative. Maybe english isn't your first language and something is getting lost in translation.
While I'm not directing this at you specifically, I left the JBR forums almost 10 years ago for two reasons...
Some very disturbed people were dominating the discussions across several forums/bulletin boards. I wasn't the only one who left due to this issue. The owners/moderators of these sites appear to have taken care of that element at some point and they deserve praise for doing so. An example of this type can be found in that thread that was bumped yesterday.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...quot-personal-quot-question-about-female-part
The other thing that frustrated me was how discussions would start running in very small circles. Someone would take time to write a well thought out post, the next person asks for the source to their info(as if an opinion needs a source), they post a link to a site containing some of the issues they bring up, on the next page this same person starts asking them(again) disingenuous rhetorical questions which starts the whole song and dance over again. Repeat cycle. This tactic got old very, very quickly to me.
That may not be your intent and I apologize if taking it the wrong way. I am definitely not interested in an argument on the issue but I'm not going to repeat that same minor point again. I'd much rather we continue the discussion instead of the two of us riding this specific merry go round.