Cindy Anthony Says Someone Hacked Her Email Account *REVISITED*

[impatientredhead]

But prior to the claim that Cindy's email account was hacked, WFTV reported that the FBI was investigating the hairbrush incident and saying that Cindy could face obstruction of justice charges. The email hacking has not yet been reported to police, there is no reason the FBI would be involved in this supposed investigation. WFTV is rapidly losing the little bit of credibility they still had, IMO.

I am not following why the FBI investigating the hairbrush/obstruction issue is a reflection of WFTV's credibility? Did WFTV contact the FBI with that info and not local LE? Or did they simply state that the FBI is investigating it? The hacking issue would be under FBI jurisdiction.

Cindy has stated many times that local LE and her have issues. I wouldn't find it odd at all for local LE to let the feds handle the investigation of the hairbrush issue just to keep things clean and not have anyone say they are out to get the Anthony's. The FBI is involved in this case anyway. I don't think they would come into a case just for that, but they are already deeply involved in this one. They have stayed involved long after it was clear there was no kidnapping.

 

[RR0004]

But prior to the claim that Cindy's email account was hacked, WFTV reported that the FBI was investigating the hairbrush incident and saying that Cindy could face obstruction of justice charges. The email hacking has not yet been reported to police, there is no reason the FBI would be involved in this supposed investigation. WFTV is rapidly losing the little bit of credibility they still had, IMO.

Could it be that it was because the info came from emails sent back and forth from a certain person to CA?

 

[Chilly Willy]

I am not following why the FBI investigating the hairbrush/obstruction issue is a reflection of WFTV's credibility? Did WFTV contact the FBI with that info and not local LE? Or did they simply state that the FBI is investigating it? The hacking issue would be under FBI jurisdiction.

Cindy has stated many times that local LE and her have issues. I wouldn't find it odd at all for local LE to let the feds handle the investigation of the hairbrush issue just to keep things clean and not have anyone say they are out to get the Anthony's. The FBI is involved in this case anyway. I don't think they would come into a case just for that, but they are already deeply involved in this one. They have stayed involved long after it was clear there was no kidnapping.

I think WFTV is sensationalizing the story about the hairbrush as well as many other stories relating to the Anthonys. KB sent the email about the hairbrush to the FBI, who basically told her that they will look into the matter. WFTV turned that into an 'investigation' that could result in charges against Cindy.

 

[Jolynna]

I think that's her way of saying that yes, it was hacked and no, I didn't accidentally forward them.

Which is exactly what I think she did.

Although, it's very simple to hack Yahoo's email service, from what I understand.

It is very easy to hack into yahoo e-mail. I have known people that have done it to check out their significant others. Most people use simple passwords they can remember like an old dog's name or their address.

Cindy's yahoo e-mail address was made public in the last document dump.

With the e-mail address, anyone who wanted to read Cindy's e-mail could have hacked into it from anywhere in the world. They wouldn't have to be skilled or a geek.

I am not saying it happened or that it didn't happened. I only know for a fact that yahoo e-mail is easy to get into.

 

[PassTheMotrin]

Well, he that shall remain unnamed posted on his blog yesterday that he has been interviewed by OCSO and turned over the information to them. So they do have it.

 

[Jolynna]

I just found it odd that someone broke into it while they were away, like you have to be gone for it to happen.

Actually someone could hack into her account while she was online and using it. Yahoo e-mail would let 500 people log-in to the same account at the same time from all over the world and nobody would know the 500 hackers were there unless the hackers deleted or composed.

Evidently Cindy doesn't know this.

 

[Jolynna]

An interview about the e-mail hacking will be on this radio station on Sunday:

http://www..net/118858

 

[MyTinkieGirl]

An interview about the e-mail hacking will be on this radio station on Sunday:

http://www..net/118858

The guest is probably "he that shall remain un-named"....he's pretty PO'd at her right now and had been in contact with her in the past months.


ETA : He's not gonna be on his blog for a while....so maybe it's not him....

 

[Valrico Analyzer]

rules in the jail house??? JB knowing them???? thought he made up his own little set---guess we will see something about it---along with the usual "I didn't know" response from a criminal atty.....

as for your original quesiton I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW THAT ANSWER MYSELF!--

jmo

ABSOLUTELY PROHIBETED. SECURITY CONCERNS...ESCAPE PLANS, ETC. NO GOVERNSHIP OF WHAT THEYRE LOOKING AT AND WHAT THEYRE SENDING TO OTHERS. I imagine there will be umpteen restrictions. She may be able to look at a screen with him, if its a word doc....but no way on the internet. Besides, a jail doesnt have wireless, and with cement and steel they wouldn't be able to use it. The only way she can see the outside world would be if he copied internet pages and pasted them in word. Probably going to be him sitting across from her typing notes of things she says. They would not let her near the keyboard...and they have guards outside the meeting room and are observed at all time. Now, Im not sure, but I think she can write on a pad & give it to him (perfect way to send info to parents under the atty/client priviledge) but if she tried to hand him anything other than paper it would be considered contraband and be confiscated.

 

[TURBOTHINK]

I wondered the same thing when I saw the article saying the FBI was supposedly investigating the email about the hairbrush. The collection of evidence had nothing to do with the FBI, why would they do the investigating?

If you read the documents, it was the FBI who initiated the warrant which asked for the hairbrushes. It was the FBI she conned.

 

[TURBOTHINK]

It is very easy to hack into yahoo e-mail. I have known people that have done it to check out their significant others. Most people use simple passwords they can remember like an old dog's name or their address.

Cindy's yahoo e-mail address was made public in the last document dump.

With the e-mail address, anyone who wanted to read Cindy's e-mail could have hacked into it from anywhere in the world. They wouldn't have to be skilled or a geek.

I am not saying it happened or that it didn't happened. I only know for a fact that yahoo e-mail is easy to get into.

Any email account is easily hacked if someone wanted the information, but only a dishonest person would do it.

 

[impatientredhead]

If you read the documents, it was the FBI who initiated the warrant which asked for the hairbrushes. It was the FBI she conned.

Thank you for clearing that up.

 

[impatientredhead]

I think WFTV is sensationalizing the story about the hairbrush as well as many other stories relating to the Anthonys. KB sent the email about the hairbrush to the FBI, who basically told her that they will look into the matter. WFTV turned that into an 'investigation' that could result in charges against Cindy.

Okay, gotcha. I share that opinion about sensationalized reporting but generalize it to most of the media, the vast majority. So much of what is printed is inaccurate, taken out of context, etc.... Not sure I see more of that with WFTV than anyone else.

 

[Chilly Willy]

If you read the documents, it was the FBI who initiated the warrant which asked for the hairbrushes. It was the FBI she conned.

Where in the documents can I find that? I don't recall there being a warrant for the hairbrush. According to the information in the August 5th OSCO search warrant, the hairbrushes and other items were collected by Yuri on July 21st. The FBI wasn't even involved at that point if I remember correctly. Why would the FBI issue a warrant for something the Sheriff already had?

 

[McSev]

If I am not mistaken I took mine off the PI's information. I am still looking.

I am not sure what one you are referring to if it is different.

The problem is that the PI's information is it could be completely bogus. The headers to those emails with the body of the message intact, to my knowledge, do not exist anywhere I've seen in my endless bounding about the Internet. To me, professionally, it's heresay on behalf of the PI and the grandmother - they don't know what they're talking about, and I'm relatively sure the PI isn't an information, network or computer system engineer or computer forensics specialist.

When an email is sent, the email header data that's transferred, including the body of the message, has a unique and specific format and feed along Internet backbone routers and switches until it reaches it's intended recipient (or victim, depending on what the message is about. ) The problem here is that again, to my knowledge, NONE of that exists anywhere for these emails we can see to validate it.

Further, sometimes even the header, at first glance, can be deceptive because tracerts (traceroutes) can be fallible due to the way networks route their traffic and display name resolution - and these routes change all the time and switches and routers "cache" (save) some information to speed the data along. If it gets leaked that the FBI has asked the grandmother's ISP for information, you'll know then it's likely that they have traced the data back to her cable or DSL modem. ISP's have the responsibility, under federal warrants or subpeonas, to provide the same level of detail that Casey Anthony's wireless carrier, AT&T, had to provide to OSCO.

 

[kgeaux]

Forgive me... but I'm confused! Is the FBI investigating the supposed hacking or are they investigating the contents of the emails?

Both, I hope. It is illegal to use the internet to hack into someone else's account, isn't it?

I just found it odd that someone broke into it while they were away, like you have to be gone for it to happen.

I think Cindy's statement speaks to the fact that she didn't understand what "hacking" meant. Cindy was assuming that whoever got to her emails had to have had physical access to her computer. I don't think she knew it could be done "remotely."

 

[passionflower]

CA probably did the letters in a drugged state of mind.........hit the wrong button and sent them, then when confronted, CA spun the hacking story, IMO FBI will be all over it.
CA was strange on her own, know mix it with meds..........even stranger!!! IMO

 

[Alcestic]

I bet it was Zenadia. She is a ninja. Can't even prove she exists, that's just the way it happens for this family. Why do people have to pick on them? They are such a honest, caring, functional and quiet family. Gee Whiz!

 

[100%Agave]

So, just to revisit this topic, did CA in fact report the hacking and has it or is it being investigated?

I haven't heard a word about this, so I have to wonder if this was not just so much CA smoke blowing again.

 

[JustJax]

So, just to revisit this topic, did CA in fact report the hacking and has it or is it being investigated?

I haven't heard a word about this, so I have to wonder if this was not just so much CA smoke blowing again.

I have not seen any follow up on this "story." With the talk of them seeking immunity now, I am VERY suspect of this claim.

IMO there was something in the emails that show they know a hell of alot more than they claim and CA was making a false claim of hacking....

More computers taken from the home Thursday after all.