lowens1975
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Messages
- 847
- Reaction score
- -10
So why didn't CA pursue custody of Caylee? The answer is probably pretty simple. When they all went to the attorney about CA and GA getting custody of Caylee in case something happened to KC the attorney told them he needed to get the father's signature on a form waiving his rights. That's when the father "became" dead. The A's were still not able to do the paperwork because they would have to go before the judge and prove this man was the father. So there you have it. Even if CA KNEW KC was a bad mother, not saying she was, CA would not have gotten Caylee unless she could prove the father was not available or, in fact, deceased. The court would have wanted a name. CA may have feared losing Caylee for good.
CA knew how dangerous KC was because she told RP he needed to stay away from her because KC was a sociopath. No wonder CA will not admit anything. If only CA allowed the father into this child's life Caylee might still be alive today. jmo
Good point. I don't know exactly when GA and CA went to the attorney's, I wish I did. Because I've suspected all along the obit was bogus.
Usually with the courts, where there is a 'will' there is a 'way'. You can divorce a person without notifying them if you don't know where they are to begin with. I've seen 'Notice of Intent to Adopt' or something along those lines in the legal sections of the newspaper. You just have to prove that you did a diligent search for the missing party. I can almost bet that if CA wanted to push the issue of adoption she could have, it just would have been harder without the Caylee's father's written consent. And besides, I don't think the lawyer they went to knew anything about adoptions.