Question 1: If they had DNA then why weren't the words DNA up in big lights back in October? The words used were "forensic link" and only one publication used the letters "DNA". I would have though LE finding DNA is a massive breakthrough and the letters DNA would be splashed on the cover of every WA newspaper?
Question 2: It seems pretty clear Bret Christian is the chosen mouthpiece by police. I assume this is because he is local and they believe the CSK is local.
So;
Karra victim tied up with clothes line that has printing material on it.
Police lost evidence and found it 15 years later. That evidence showed fibres from the VS Commodore that were found on JR. After she was exposed to the elements for 5 months.
Err, what? He just said the evidence was lost and then relocated in 2011. Now he's saying 2004?
It was also widely reported that all 8/9 reviews of the case found no incompetence on behalf of the police.
My "sh** not adding up" beacon is flashing and making a loud noise. Maybe I'm reading it wrong because I've had a few beers but it's just not quite adding up right now. The only thing I'm sure about is police are working pretty hard for a result.
It does show complete utter incompetence from the police to lose evidence in Australia's biggest most expensive investigation, ever. Mind blowing. Atleast they found it though after all those years. There was a similar situation with Hayley Dodd so the police need to have a review on their evidence holding process and sort it out, now.
It's not clear if he is linked to the printing business, although the article does imply that. However if he stole the washing line from a business that did printing on fabric and dyes then it's very possible that he is not linked to those businesses. Although the way both articles are written you would think it is implying that there is enough forensic evidence to suggest he may be linked. I think that needs to be looked at more closely as it may narrow the focus somewhat. It should still be out there but whether it is known for certain that the link it definite.
Its definitely good news and it does now narrow the focus to potential suspects somewhat to a point that the public may actually be able to help the case in some capacity. Its a smart move and should have been done alot earlier.
The key part of the post article are the following.
The Karrakatta victim apparently identified a 'white panel van' -
Witness Statement
Jane Rimmer was abducted in a 'white Holden VS Commodore Series 1' (thought to be Station Wagon) -
match the upholstery
The Karrakatta Victim was tied up with 'washing line' -
impregnated with materialused in screen printing
'Traces of DNA' were left on the Karrakatta Victim
DNA left on the body of the 1997 victim,Ciara Glennon