ChatteringBirds
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 10,292
- Reaction score
- 52,251
I don't think we can discuss the past records, even public records, of someone not yet named a POI nor arrested by LE.
The only thing we're cleared to discuss on that front, according to the rules, are the comments TS made herself, about this subject in her one and only interview, and anything (if there is anything) posted in any MSM article. I'm not sure those documents were ever posted from an approved source, but folks are welcome to do their own research, off-site, all day longI thought all this was true until I went and looked into it more. It's very unclear what all the reasons were for her losing her license in SC, and it hasn't been reported in MSM so we can't discuss it. She does allude to it in an interview though (she blames it on external circumstances, but I am not so sure. Quote
Are we allowed to post the court documents concerning her past teaching issues??
I know, I know, you would think I would know this by now, but I do get confused as to what "documents" can be posted here.
Editedbyme-- I flagged post for mod to review
Did not hear her refer to LE.Well plus she said LE had asked her not to talk about the case. You know that's not true, she would have just been talking about a missing child, any information she would give the public might help, but she knows they suspect her and she is already thinking of the legal ramifications to her of saying the wrong thing. She anticipated difficult questions from the reporter so shifts the reason she is not prepared to answer to LE.
Yeah, I wonder what question was asked. Maybe she brought up crime in the area to suggest he might have been kidnapped or met up with the wrong people. JmoIt was edited when "She talked about general crime when she didn't understand the questions"... ?
Would have liked to see the whole thing, including her 'confusion' about what she was being asked.
I second that!And even if he came strolling out from the woods and asked everyone too please apologize to her. I STILL wouldn’t like her.
Evidence taken from the house, vehicles.If LE did not have the neighbor's video of TS leaving with him and returning without him, I wonder how they would ever be able to charge her if his body is not found. What else would be convincing of her guilt?
That’s what I think too ...but why no arrest yet?I know the "deleted isn't really deleted" rule of thumb, so let's just hope it holds true in this case as well. I have no doubt, their ring.com account info has already been gone through by the investigators.
Yes but get your links ready folks ....The only thing we're cleared to discuss on that front, according to the rules, are the comments TS made herself, about this subject in her one and only interview, and anything (if there is anything) posted in any MSM article. I'm not sure those documents were ever posted from an approved source, but folks are welcome to do their own research, off-site, all day long![]()
Very early on they discussed searching the landfills - it’s in the media thread and on my timelineThere is a landfill very close to their neighborhood. Has it been searched?
What I’d like to know why isn’t she a person of interest? LE must be giving her room toI don't think we can discuss the past records, even public records, of someone not yet named a POI nor arrested by LE.
Good question.That’s what I think too ...but why no arrest yet?
What I’d like to know why isn’t she a person of interest? LE must be giving her room to
slip up and lead them to Gannon.
Yes, and I see that Gannon went out to play, not go to a friend's house. Contradicts what LE reported which I think came from the 911 call. I guess it's hard keeping track of fibs. MOO.JMO It reads more like an alibi poster.
TS said in her infamous Academy Award winning interview that they have 2 dogs at home.All the Pet Co discussion, are there pets in this home, a dog or cats? Maybe fish?
Member @californiagem cleverly spotted the Ring notification icon on the phone screen that had the photo of step-mom, Gannon and his sister, that was used in the original "missing" flyer. So yes, all indications are that the Stauch home also had a Ring cam. No one keeps the app if they don't have the cam, and the icon doesn't come up unless there are unchecked notifications. So, if she used that pic from her phone on Monday to create the "missing" flyer, we know the Ring cam at the Stauch home was working on Monday. The question now is, did she delete all the videos, or just the ones of her and Gannon leaving, and her coming home alone?
There may be more evidence from other video and witnesses that disprove her timeline and description of events.If LE did not have the neighbor's video of TS leaving with him and returning without him, I wonder how they would ever be able to charge her if his body is not found. What else would be convincing of her guilt?