I do wonder if over the months, PF and KK planned it so that would be each others' reasonable doubt. KK has her deal, her lawyer was with her for the 4.5 hour video testimony and will prep her and keep her on track at trial. KK will be the source of multiple reasonable doubts perhaps resulting in a hopelessly hung jury or even a Casey A. acquittal. It could be KK does her 3 years, PF spends 3 years in county jail, and that's it.
PF is deserving of the “dumbest criminal of the year” award.
This guy was so stupid, that he kept KB’s phone with him for two days after he last claimed to have seen her.
Apparently he doesn’t know how to use Google.
What you are describing doesn’t happen with people exhibiting this pattern of behavior (complete ignorance and stupidity).
These people don’t cast reasonable doubt in one another. They incriminate one another.
Even if these were two criminal geniuses, they couldn’t pull off a conspiracy like that.
That’s a bad movie, not real life.
If the jury doesn’t believe KK, fine.
Explain the lie about when he last saw her (corroborated by surveillance footage and cell phone data).
Explain the fact that his phone was texting and calling KB for two days after she was dead.
Explain the phone call to KK after PF left KB’s house, a phone call that jibes with her account of him telling her “you have a mess to clean up.”
Explain how KK had KB’s phone.
Explain the lies to Doss, law enforcement, and CB.
Explain the physical evidence at the barn, to include those cadaver dog hits.
Explain the blood evidence in KB’s home.
Explain the evidence of a fire at PF’s ranchette.
Explain the forensic evidence (we don’t know the full extent of this yet).
We’ve been privy to so little, but somehow, it’s a lot.
The defense already has its hands full, and we’re just getting started.