All they have is the time and date KB was last seen on store video. That isn't conclusive evidence she died within two hours at that point in time nor is it proof PF murdered her.
I seriously doubt PF testifies but all the defense has to do is point out that cell phone data isn't infallible and neither is PF's memory.
I don't know who Dad with a phone is but all it takes is one member of the jury to question and have doubts.
JMO
BBMFF:
That is most certainly
not "all that they have."
They have camera evidence of KB arriving back at the townhome after her trip to Walmart on the 22nd.
They also have PF on camera outside the townhome on the 22nd.
They also have PF's movements in his truck that day, along w/ the cell phone pings showing both his and KB's phones were moving in the same direction at the same time as PF's truck that day.
There is a plethora of evidence in this case. The cell phone evidence alone is going to be damning to PF, IMO, never mind all of the blood/forensic evidence that LE has gathered and the corroborating testimony that KK will provide that further substantiates the evidence that has been collected.
Nobody, but nobody, is going to be relying upon PF's memory of events to make a determination about what happened here.
The one thing I do wholeheartedly agree with you about is the importance of the jury composition.
DA May must make sure that the jurors selected are intelligent, reasonable, objective, rational human beings.
To that end, all of the Lifetime movie buffs, conspiracy theorists, devils' advocates, feelings- over-facts types and/or certifiable fruit loops will need to be issued peremptory challenges and sent on home to watch the trial from the comfort of their overstuffed La-Z-Boy recliners.
Either that, or they can just go back to watching the Lifetime channel and/or reading their latest Silhouette Romance novel. Whichever. Just as long as none of those irrational types are on the jury.
DA May knows the type of jurors he needs to select. He'll get his picks right.
JMO.
