Still Missing CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *arrest* #92

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi @Seattle1

If the trial is moved outside the 11th District and Linda Stanley's jurisdiction, would it proceed as planned beginning in early May?

This would not give new DA much time to prepare so is this the reason Barry's team would push for another change of venue?

If the trial is moved would the current DA's office work in collaboration with new DA's office so that both are actively representing the State during the trial?

It seems the defense would desire Linda Stanley to lead prosecution since she is a new DA, one assistant DA has left, and there have been a few misteps that were acknowledged by both judges. Add to this she is not experienced prosecuting a M1 no body case.

Just wondering how another change of venue benefits defense...

p.s. really frustrated watching defense make inflammatory accusations that border on lying or at least an egregious misrepresentation of truth.

Also, the hacking incident that never was!

Really disappointed the judge proceeded to then further limit the ability for the reporting of real-time, minute by minute details.

It seems the defense is allowed to go on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on...
Sorry, my post was unclear. There would not be a change in the administration of the trial, only the jury pool. The idea of moving outside DA Stanley's jurisdiction means a jury outside of her constituents, and not eliminating the DA's office from the trial.
 
Oh GAWD! It’s national news by now, ffs!! Morning news and night. Next they’ll be asking for a change of country. Lol
It is a done deal for now but defense wanted to be on the record for a future motion should polling present the same issues or different issues in Fremont County. All normal normal stuff in my opinion in a controversial case.
 
I want to point something out here that many seem to be missing.

Barry pulled the fuse on his truck in an attempt to keep it from tracking his movements. He mostly succeeded.

Do y'all think he just knew to do that? No, he looked it up.

This is practically brand new tech, he didn't learn about that from an old episode of Forensic Files. Barry knew what he was doing and he knew well enough to hide every web search he did on how to get rid of his wife and left his *advertiser censored* searches because it would be more suspicious if he didn't have *advertiser censored* cookies on his devices. Too many people assume he's dumb, Barry's a cunning guy. Thinking he's just a dumb redneck works in his favor.

This supposedly dumb redneck murdered his wife and hid her body without leaving a speck of physical evidence.

Trying to make his machinations super convoluted or super simple in order to make them fit with ones personal view of Barry's intelligence/ability is folly.
Excellent commentary!
 
Here it is:
Q (Lindsey): Working through may 9th, 2020 is there messages between Barry and Suzanne at 9:50 am?

A (Grusing): Barry messaged her, “Want to hike?” At 9:52 she messaged, “Where?” But he did not answer.

Q (Lindsey): Text messages from Suzanne at 10:30 on May 9th?

A (Grusing): Suzanne texted, “Do we have old summer tires for Rover?

Q (Lindsey): Is there a message at 10:36 am?

A (Grusing): Yes. She messaged him, “Wanna meet to hike?”

Q (Lindsey): Did she respond?

A (Grusing): Barry responded 12 minutes later, “No I’ll come home.”

Q (Lindsey): Did Suzanne respond to him?

A (Grusing): One minute later she texted, “Get hot tub stuff.”
Thank you! I hadn't seen that before.
 
I haven’t been able to keep up with the posts for several days so I apologize if this has been discussed already.

Something I wondered early on and I think MH2 answered it here when he said in the bodycam video that the girls’ texts to their mom were not being “delivered” since the morning. The texts were “not going through” since Suzanne’s phone was likely inoperable. It sounds to me like the texts were getting flagged as “not delivered”. My point is that it was not just a matter of Suzanne not responding to texts, but that the texts were getting flagged as not delivered. Would this be the case if Suzanne’s phone was disabled? Would the texts be flagged on the sender’s phone as not delivered? Due to the poor cell service at PP I wonder how common of an occurrence this was. The girls being concerned about this leads me to believe that it was not a super common occurrence. I am interested to hear the details of conversations between BM, MM1 and MM2 on Sunday, I hope we get more information on this at the trial.

IMO
You’re spot on. She had Wi-Fi at home, so her texts would always be delivered if at home. Spotty cell service wouldn’t be an issue at home. MM2 knew that. I wonder how early their first attempt was. In fact, I wonder what Barry’s phone showed under the good morning text he sent Suzanne that morning.. bet it gave him a chill when it read “Not Delivered” in green rather than iPhone blue.
 
Last edited:
Indiana is irrelevant to the trial and won't be admitted. All we know from IN is that Barry is a terrible person. He's a cheater, he's ripped people off, and he has a violent streak.

The only part of that that might be admissible is the violent streak since I believe the cops had to be called on an incident with him and another guy in Indiana. I cannot remember the specifics, so I can't find the article to reference, but I bet someone else can recall it.
The other guy came out worse than Barry if I recall in court as they were both charged and that guy really held a grudge so prosecution prolly not going to call that guy or use him as a witness because defense would have a field day with him. If I can remember the name I will see if I can find a link…he was pretty much putting himself in the news when Suzanne went missing. If I recall he was also a local politician so had better than most access to media channels.
 
Indiana is irrelevant to the trial and won't be admitted. All we know from IN is that Barry is a terrible person. He's a cheater, he's ripped people off, and he has a violent streak.

The only part of that that might be admissible is the violent streak since I believe the cops had to be called on an incident with him and another guy in Indiana. I cannot remember the specifics, so I can't find the article to reference, but I bet someone else can recall it.
Who did he cheat with? I don't believe he ever had an affair with anyone. The only altercation in Indy was a guy he had do something on a job he was doing and the guy did not do it right or something and Barry's reputation was on the line so he got angry at this guy. B & S have zero domestic violence calls. Noone is coming out and saying anything different on this except for the assumptions on here.
 
Sorry, my post was unclear. There would not be a change in the administration of the trial, only the jury pool. The idea of moving outside DA Stanley's jurisdiction means a jury outside of her constituents, and not eliminating the DA's office from the trial.

Thank you, and the lack of clarity is on my part.
I appreciate your insight and opinions.
 
True!
But I tend to be a justice over legal gal...

Defense is earning every dollar, that's for sure!
You mean state over defense right? Justice encompasses the entire process. As a woman I admire strong female defense attorneys. It was a man’s world for so long. When I was young and taking my LSATs everyone was encouraging civil but I think I could have sunk my teeth into criminal. I switched to business school :-( it is a different world today for women. They told us back then we could be and do anything but it wasn’t really true. Today it is. And these ladies are fierce. Gals they are :-)
 
Who did he cheat with? I don't believe he ever had an affair with anyone. The only altercation in Indy was a guy he had do something on a job he was doing and the guy did not do it right or something and Barry's reputation was on the line so he got angry at this guy. B & S have zero domestic violence calls. Noone is coming out and saying anything different on this except for the assumptions on here.
That’s not how the story with the guy in Indiana went, but ok. What about SO? She’s saying it. BM admitted to clipping her nose and chasing her around the resort trying to grab her phone. Then there is the time BM spied on SO and SM to the point SM almost called the police. Don’t try to say BM wasn't and isn’t abusive. He is.
 
I want to point something out here that many seem to be missing.

Barry pulled the fuse on his truck in an attempt to keep it from tracking his movements. He mostly succeeded.

Do y'all think he just knew to do that? No, he looked it up.

This is practically brand new tech, he didn't learn about that from an old episode of Forensic Files. Barry knew what he was doing and he knew well enough to hide every web search he did on how to get rid of his wife and left his *advertiser censored* searches because it would be more suspicious if he didn't have *advertiser censored* cookies on his devices. Too many people assume he's dumb, Barry's a cunning guy. Thinking he's just a dumb redneck works in his favor.

This supposedly dumb redneck murdered his wife and hid her body without leaving a speck of physical evidence.

Trying to make his machinations super convoluted or super simple in order to make them fit with ones personal view of Barry's intelligence/ability is folly.
He used his VPN to do the research and use his burner phone. The VPN he bought on MM1’s credit card. The VPN we only know about because Suzanne listed it in her notes on her phone.
 
You mean state over defense right? Justice encompasses the entire process. As a woman I admire strong female defense attorneys. It was a man’s world for so long. When I was young and taking my LSATs everyone was encouraging civil but I think I could have sunk my teeth into criminal. I switched to business school :-( it is a different world today for women. They told us back then we could be and do anything but it wasn’t really true. Today it is. And these ladies are fierce. Gals they are :)

"You mean state over defense right?"

No, I mean JUSTICE and it doesn't favor either side... that's the point!

I do admire your tenacity and appreciate your viewpoints...
 
Other than threatening suicide when Suzanne brought up divorce, holding a gun to his head, admittedly clipping her nose, phone stalking Suzanne when she was at Sheila's, trying to use his own daughter as a weapon, stalking Suzanne and Sheila in person, and ultimately murdering her, he's probably not abusive.

Everyone has a bad...year or two.

Or something.
 
He used his VPN to do the research and use his burner phone. The VPN he bought on MM1’s credit card. The VPN we only know about because Suzanne listed it in her notes on her phone.
Believe it or not, disabling GPS/telematics on Ford Trucks is a serious subject by truck owners. There are multi-pages about it on F-Ford forums. I don't doubt BM researched the same.
 
Added to them not thinking he killed their mother, is the fact that she betrayed him by this affair.

Well she probably would have been murdered two years earlier had she just asked for a divorce and not begun the affair.

The only gaslighting going on here is turning an abusive killer into some sort of victim.
 
If he is guilty - then this is the kind of gaslighting I am sure is going on

She is the bad one. He is the victim. It's incredibly destructive.
Yep
Life with a narcissist like BM is horribly toxic to those around him . SM paid with her life and daughters damage will take many years to unravel and heal if at all possible
Almost everyone on here!
LOL, reading the AA and watching body cam footage highly recommended
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
264
Guests online
328
Total visitors
592

Forum statistics

Threads
608,743
Messages
18,245,098
Members
234,438
Latest member
Turtle17
Back
Top