I think you’re right and if so, literally NOTHING Barry could say would be credible.
He heard a noise in the night and thought a mouse/chipmunk/ Mexican was in the garage so he checked her purse was still there.
I think you’re right and if so, literally NOTHING Barry could say would be credible.
^^rbbmSupposing the State did get a bombshell tidbit that slam dunks the whole thing, at what point is the State required to notify the defense of the new testimony in Colorado? I imagine these rules vary wildly from state to state.
If there's something incredibly incriminating on one of the dozens of hard drives already handed over, obviously the defense already has it and the State can quietly giggle to themselves. We just have to wonder how much truth Barry told E&N.
Yes and in most states domestic violence is "assault" and is evaluated by the prosecutors office for the batterer's criminal history, photographs of visible injuries or property damages, 911 tapes, medical records, witness statements, prior history of domestic abuse, etc. In some states verbal abuse or domestic or family abuse is chargeable as harassment if the verbal abusers threatens bodily harm, causes fear, etc. but is generally a misdemeanor charge. Stalking is also a charge that is sometimes used in domestic or family abuse cases. So under the "umbrella" of domestic or family abuse there are a number of charges that prosecutors can charge depending on how the state laws are defined. In this case it was a sentence enhancer...if Barry were found guilty and the judge felt the act of domestic violence was supported the sentence could be increased. Here's alittle bit about Colorado domestic violence laws: 2016 Colorado Revised Statutes :: Title 18 - :: Criminal Code :: Article 6 - :: Offenses Involving the Family Relations :: Part 8 - :: Domestic Violence :: § 18-6-801. Domestic violence - sentencing and this lawyer's blog lays out the enhancer: Domestic Violence Enhancement: What Does It Mean in Colorado?
We have something v similar here in the UK too.Just as an fyi - In Connecticut there is a new law that expands the definition of domestic violence to include coercive control. “Jennifer’s Law” was named after Jennifer Dulos and Jennifer Magnano, two Ct women, who were tragically killed by their husbands as they were attempting divorce. Maybe this new law will spur other states to reevaluate their DV definitions. BBM below
A closer look at CT's new domestic violence law: Jennifer's law | fox61.com
The law is more than 40 pages long and includes a number of new measures to help domestic violence victims, but perhaps the most profound piece of the new law is the expanded definition of domestic violence to include “coercive control.” It’s defined in the law as “a pattern of behavior that in purpose or effect unreasonably interferes with a person’s free will and personal liberty.” That can include isolating, controlling, regulating, monitoring, threatening behavior, or financial abuse.
“Coercive control and controlling behavior, in general, is the crux of domestic violence," said Karen Foley O'Connor, Executive Director of The Network Against Domestic Abuse. "What’s good about this bill is that we now have [an] agreed-upon language to define it here in the state.”
As noted in my OP, I was citing from memory but after looking at the timeline in the MEDIA thread, I was off about the time BM rescheduled the blade on the bobcat replaced. Nonetheless, I think it would have been reasonable if BM was leaving work around 11 AM that he'd initially plan to stop by DSi around noon before heading to PP.
We know that BM sent MG home from the river house/beach project around 11 AM -- citing he was going to have recreation time with SM. Evidence shows BM did not go to DSi but instead stopped at Tailwinds (Poncha Springs).
I think somewhere between Tailwinds and arriving PP, BM decided soup could wait because he first wanted to hike down to the river behind his house to retrieve his game webcams. There was never a Turkey. I believe after BM stored the cameras in the garage, he went inside, had some soup, a few words with SM, and left again headed to DSi for the blade change at 2 pm.
CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 , MEDIA,MAPS,TIMELINE *NO DISCUSSION*
Text messages:
9:50am BM: Wanna go on a hike?
9:52am SM: where? (no response). Later on, asking about summer tires on range rover?
10:36am SM: Wanna meet to hike? 12 minutes later at
10:48am BM: No, coming home.
SM: Get Hot tub stuff.
He went to Tail winds property around 11am then went home around 11:30am to eat veggie soup with Suzanne.
At 11:50am-12:50am, Morphew's phone is pinged near the river behind his home. Investigators asked why this was, his response was, "I was looking for a turkey that MM had shot some time ago."
Morphew allegedly left [PP] around 1:30pm makes a few calls checks out a job at Kim Gyms in Salida.
At 1:42pm Suzanne's last "proof of life" was a photo she sent to her lover on LinkedIn, according to FBI agent. She was out sunbathing. Shortly before she had messaged him saying “Guess who’s alone again??”
At 1:55pm door opens at DSI (Diesslin Structures, Inc.) in Salida & there is surveillance video as well.
At 2pm Morphew was getting his blade replaced on his bobcat.
At 2:03pm while Morphew was away Suzanne was sending LinkedIn messages to Jeff Libler. Investigators showed a picture Suzanne sent to Jeff to Barry, he said she "looked drunk" & she had "drunk eyes" Grusing says it's the last 'proof of life' for Suzanne.
At 2:11pm Suzanne told JL to get on What's Up App. She messaged him on LinkedIn. Exhibit #59: The photo is shown in the courtroom, Suzanne smiling.
Truck GPS coordinates show Barry's truck goes into park at 2:43:59.
Phone coordinates show he walks around the house. You can hear a pin drop in the courtroom as tension is high. Agent Grusing asked what he was doing outside. Morphew responded, "I shoot chipmunks. I have shot 85 chipmunks."
Then returned home around 2:44pm as she was sunbathing & sending photos of herself to her lover, Jeff Libler.
At 2:47pm, BM's phone goes into airplane mode. Suzanne's phone is getting messages from her lover, Libler asking about the weather. meanwhile, BM says he was moving around the house shooting chipmunks.
I wasn't so sure I was on-board with the idea of BM swapping out the SIM card on the bobcat, but I am now.
Check out the first line of the skid steer data, which is from 5/4. The odometer is at zero! I think this indicates that a new SIM card was installed, as we haven't heard anything about Barry buying a new bobcat. This would seem to imply that he had 2 SIM cards. I doubt that the backhoe attachment had a SIM card, as it is just an attachment, and probably has no computer in it. But I do think he somehow got a hold of another one.
The first time he started the bobcat after swapping out the SIM card on 5/4 was in a field behind Anytime Fitness at 13:08. I don't think we can determine where the bobcat was when the card was swapped, as we don't have the skid steer data before this time, but it seems possible to me that he drove to that field and then swapped it out. Perhaps a practice run?
I also noticed on the last line of the skid steer data, where it says "other" for the message type as JustTrish has mentioned previously, the GPS quality column drops to a 1. Everywhere else in the data it is a 3. I'm wondering if that happens if the SIM card is removed. Also, maybe that is why the data trail ends there, as he put in a new SIM card while at DSI (IMO). I was thinking how crazy it was that at the critical time frame that afternoon, we weren't shown any skid steer data. Well, maybe, there is none! Putting in his 2nd SIM card would explain that lack of data. He does his disposal that evening, and then puts the original SIM card back in. All IMO.
Everyone LE talked to during the course of the investigation is on the potential witness list included early in the trial or so it appeared to me. I believe the judge set a deadline for final prosecution witness list to be followed within a few weeks by the defense list. A great amount of people they interviewed won't be prosecution witnesses IMO.
^^rsbbmIf I were making lists he might be on the defense witness list so could get cross examined by prosecution but I doubt he's on the prosecution list.
I can see how a young person faced with such an overwhelming dilemma may well choose the path of least resistance.
For one thing, practicalities usually come into play for most unhappy domestic situations. Anyone who says “but why didn’t the person just leave?” irritates me. Unless the person is totally financially independent, for one thing there is often nowhere to go other than a charity refuge or a temporary sofa. That reality can be a persuasive argument that things aren’t quite so bad and can be tolerated.
Added to this case, we’re talking about a person who hasn’t grown into adulthood yet let alone having independence of any kind, plus she very probably loves her father and wants to believe the best.
I do wish the trio presented a less joyful tableau entering the court but I was taken by something Lauren said in her summary video of the hearing before last. She said MM2 at one point broke down in tears and was inconsolable, which I think was telling. She’s probably keeping deep feelings buried, but now and then they may out. One day I believe the scales will fall and she will need to confront the truth emotionally.
Ofc Lauren also said that Barry had a similar episode and his lawyer made a show of comforting him. I suspect the motive behind that boo hoo show was very different.
All JMO.
Oh man, that never occurred to me.
If her vehicle showed ANY activity at all around that time, it's absolutely damning.
We already have two data points showing that Barry was outside when he should have been sleeping, and one of them (phone) may put him in the area of the bike.
But her doors opening would solidify the bike dump.
^^bbmAnd you know defense exhibits submitted into evidence have ZERO traces listed for Barry's truck from 10:13 until 1:55. Wonder why that is? Every section they have in evidence jumps right over that time frame. I think they know that is a crucial time. His truck does not do what he said he did. I think that very time frame could be what shows premedication (not that some other things don't). If he said he was coming home, but didn't even pull in the drive way and then wandered the woods, not having lunch with suzanne, not sunbathing, but instead doing something so important he had to come home and move the bobcat blade change back a bit.. then he's calling her as he's heading toward DSI.. seems to me he needed to call her because he didn't see her during his veggie soup lunch and sunbathing.. maybe he wanted to make sure she wasn't on to him. Then the text "did you leave".. The defense includes all of Saturday morning and even the door open/close events that night and the backing up of the truck from the garage to the side of the house later on at 9 something.. but zero from 10:13 to 1:55.
Barry Morphew Redacted Arrest Affidavit – Find Suzanne Morphew
I have noticed, going as far back as the original “oh Suzanne” video, how rarely BM actually says Suzanne’s name. Although my math may be one or two counts off on the she’s and her’s, it is not off on the number of times he utters the name, “Suzanne”.
Referring only to above link, beginning on page 20 of page 129 through to the end of page 26, (Other Statements by Barry) Barry’s actual quotes (“…”), when he referred to Suzanne, I count the word “her” used by him 19 times. He used the word “she” 32 times, and her name? Exactly 1 time.
Oh yeah. She’s also “the lump” once, and more generously, “my wife” 3 times.
Appears to me, judging only by this one example, how little value BM holds for Suzanne.
All just JMO
^^bbm
As you also know, this case isn't reliant on the truck evidence alone because it's also BM's phone evidence that places him in the woods behind the house, allegedly looking for a turkey. (Personally, I find vehicle telematics unreliable compared to cell phone evidence and why I cite the phone records and not the telematics).
After the Bobcat blade was replaced at DSi, it's also the phone evidence that shows the estimated 9 unanswered calls to SM until BM finally sends SM the text asking if she left.
As for BM doing a secret blade change, I'd rethink that! Probable but not plausible that BM unloaded the Bobcat from the trailer, etc., all the while his phone showed he's down near the river. That is unless you think BM made a deal with the chipmunks to impersonate him for an hour or so along the river so he could secretly change the blade!
Let me preface what I have to say by reiterating the fact that MM1 and MM2 are very much victims in this case. However, and without victim blaming, it is important to analyze the Morphew family dynamic and the role this may play in BM’s upcoming trial.
That being said, I agree totally with what you have said here, @Seattle1. I think MM1 was Daddy’s girl long before this family structure began to erode. It’s very common for a child in a family to be closer to one parent than another. We all have seen cases where the loved ones or even close friends of the accused firmly refuse to accept that he/she could ever be capable of committing such an heinous act. As they say, “Love is blind.” For someone you idolize to do something awful is the ultimate act of betrayal.
That leaves MM2 in a terrible position. MM1 has been away at college while MM2 was home watching her parents’ relationship implode. She encouraged her mother to get away from this toxic environment. She offered to go with her. She stated that she did not want to be home with them all summer while they fought.
Now, Mom is gone. MM2 is alone. She is young, still in high school. After BM’s arrest, she goes to live with her sister, her Dad’s biggest champion. She is forced to make a choice between speaking up for her Mom and isolating herself from her remaining parent and only sibling, or she stands together with them to put up the false front of a tight, bonded, and loving family. Remember, as bad as he is, BM is still her Dad. What guilt she must feel. I feel very sad for this child, for both of them.
Fellow WSers, what would you do?
I totally agree!Y'all know what the State really needs? Suzanne's body. Another search should happen before the trial. One that goes up the mountain behind PP.