grayhuze
Gray Hughes
- Joined
- May 21, 2013
- Messages
- 310
- Reaction score
- 166
Actually JM argued in an evidentiary hearing (August 7, 2009) that the gunshot was first (page 2, second paragraph), he didn't change his sequence theory until late 2012, a month or two before trial began, here's a minute entry ruling in favor of the especially cruel factor for his notice of intent to seek the death penalty:
http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/082009/m3846408.pdf
thanks, I knew that was after she went with self defense but didn't have it exactly in my head. So what made them change the sequence until such a late date? Facts are the facts before that right "we believe the gunshot was first" -Flores 48 hour special. Who is we? Why wasn't that corrected in the news right after that? or anytime in the next 4 years?