I keep thinking of the Three Stooges. IMO, FD is Moe. The others' roles are up for debate, but KW comes across to me as a Curley.
The thing I still cannot wrap my head around is why MT involved herself in such a plot. She had the man. The huge house. Her daughter. Are FD's powers of persuasion that powerful?? Jennifer sure didn't think so. We really don't know much about MT; about who she is as a person outside of this case. I have yet to hear any of her loved ones speaking out on her behalf. If anyone here has, please correct me if I'm wrong. I try to put myself in MT's shoes to make sense of her involvement and I just can't get even a foot in one.
MOO.
Maybe this will help you visualize MTs shoes better. Following in a repost of a repost! I still stand by it!!
“I posted this awhile ago-Sept 11. It was in response to another poster reminding us that there was no evidence suggesting MT was involved in the murder and that she was only charged with evidence tampering. I think it’s worth reconsidering given MTs latest move:
“Both MT AND FD were ONLY charged with evidence tampering. I am not aware of any evidence which directly supports your assertion that MT was not an accomplice in the murder.
I’ve long been an advocate of using a “follow the money” type approach in solving this crime. I feel the Why? of the murder is worthy of some deeper discussion that might get us thinking outside the box and stir up some creative new suggestions to fill in the still missing Wheres, Whats, Whens, and Hows.
So, Why was JD murdered?
IMO, in a general sense, the answer lies in what was the gain.
Obviously the hotly contested 2+yr divorce is the glaring red flag. Getting rid of JD ends the divorce litigation. (And maybe, just maybe, ends the money battle with GF if the grief stricken, grandchild protecting, grandma withdraws.) Perhaps to FD, in the simplest view, kind of a best case scenario, ending the divorce, with mother gone, results in custody of the children, access to their trust funds, and full ownership of all of his and JDs assets. The money looks better to FD and his atty fees end too! Looks perfect, right? IIRC, as FD said in his latest interview , his life was “beautiful”, except for the divorce. He wanted it over. But here’s the stickler, can any sense be made out of potentially gaining a murder charge to get out of a divorce???
Yes, I know, it happens all the time-and in this past year, probably more horrifically than ever imagined, but the rage and spontaneity seen in those crimes is missing in this case.
The use of the Tacoma and the plates clearly point a premeditated murder, not one caused by a sudden explosion of anger. The limited public information available shows some of FDs movements during the last week of JDs life: smoozing KM’s STBX, dining &/or playing basketball w his kids, and hosting a dinner party. And supposedly at the same time planning JDs murder. The equation is simply not adding up. What’s missing? Where is the rage or anger needed to override the rational of not trading a divorce action for a murder charge?
For arguments sake, perhaps we are missing information that does show some rage. Were JD and FD arguing in person, on phone, via text or email? No-have not heard or seen one shrewd of evidence supporting any of these.
Did FD as JD to meet to talk and the meeting turned violent? No- then he wouldn’t have needed the Tacoma or plates.
Was the other person seemingly involved with the murder, as supported by evidence, harboring any anger or rage?
Maybe. IMO a little attention needs to be directed on MT to find the missing piece of the equation.
MT:admittedly at the car wash, claiming ignorance of what she is doing but running to her attorney afterwards.
MT: the pillow-talk-mate of the frustrated sad FD who wants nothing more than to continue his “beautiful” life and be divorced.
MT: the single mom whose child support would end in 5-6yrs. (Follow the money)
MT: the adulteress who moved her child out of state, away from her family and home, to supposedly move into a temporary house provided by her rich sugar daddy.
MT: the international mover and shaker who had put all her eggs in FDs and FOREs basket, who was watching her job and income disappear as FORE collapsed.
MT: after finally gaining access to the castle, watching as her paramour’s STBX MIL paid for their mortgage.
MT: hooked to a guy who was wrapped in litigation and couldn’t sell a house to save his life.
MT: who was denied access to her lover’s children by the court, about to face another holiday weekend of turmoil. She had to be mad as a wet hen after the judge finally gave FD Memorial Day weekend. Where was MT supposed to go for the weekend??
Now there’s a little rage.
Maybe a closer look at MT will help answer “how FD pulled off the murder” and why.”
