Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #57

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember, she did honor the advice of Bowman during the Farber vs Fore deposition and take the 5th all every single question. Did anyone ever confirm if she was on the deed for the 123 Hunter Drive, West Hartford property? She was clearly involved in hiding assets for the Fore Group, but not sure if this will come up on the criminal case. Maybe? Just enough to establish her crafty and nefarious capabilities and not necessarily under the Fotis Dulos Spell, either.
Guillaume Vidalette (remember him?) was the alleged owner, who transferred the title to the current owner, in 2018.
 
iirc, Pyetranker was one of the attorneys involved in the divorce/child custody fiasco?

Wonder if KW was that always-available-defense-attorney?

But fD was smart enough to know they were too enmeshed for court representation?

(Kent, we're here counting on you -- sing like a canary, Kent, sing!)

jmho ymmv lrr
 
iirc, Pyetranker was one of the attorneys involved in the divorce/child custody fiasco?

Wonder if KW was that always-available-defense-attorney?

But fD was smart enough to know they were too enmeshed for court representation?

(Kent, we're here counting on you -- sing like a canary, Kent, sing!)

jmho ymmv lrr

We also can't forget that fD was drowning in debt and cash poor at this time. His charming manipulation didn't work so great with those at the top of their game in the legal community. IMO, NP covered his costs but didn't take fD's case for profit but for the publicity that came with the high profile case.
 
We also can't forget that fD was drowning in debt and cash poor at this time. His charming manipulation didn't work so great with those at the top of their game in the legal community. IMO, NP covered his costs but didn't take fD's case for profit but for the publicity that came with the high profile case.
Yeah, this sounds right.
 
Judge Kevin Randolph has denied motions to suppress Michelle Troconis’ police interviews and to suppress DNA evidence at her upcoming trial in connection to the disappearance and presumed death of Jennifer Dulos.

Judge Randolph’s decision is 21 pages so I’m just posting the final page with his conclusion.

Randolph’s conclusion: “The search warrant for defendants DNA was facially valid and did not lack probable cause. The defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived her rights when she spoke to the police on June 2, June 6 and August 13….”

“…She had the assistance of competent counsel before and during the interviews. Though police used, at times, deceptive tactics her will was not overborne.”


 

Attachments

  • IMG_1259.jpeg
    IMG_1259.jpeg
    94.2 KB · Views: 11
Marissa Alter
@MarissaAlter

BREAKING: Judge Kevin Randolph has denied motions to suppress Michelle Troconis’ police interviews and to suppress DNA evidence at her upcoming trial in connection to the disappearance and presumed death of Jennifer Dulos.
@News12CT
12:24 PM · Dec 20, 2023

This followed a multi-day hearing with witness testimony and hours of Troconis’ police statements played.
@News12CT
12:27 PM · Dec 20, 2023

Judge Randolph’s decision is 21 pages so I’m just posting the final page with his conclusion.
@News12CT


Image


12:32 PM · Dec 20, 2023
 
12/20/2023

This notification is brought to you by the Connecticut Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification (SAVIN) Program.

This email is to inform you that MICHELLE TROCONIS, with docket number FST CR200241178T, has an upcoming court event.

A/An Hearing has been scheduled for 01/08/2024. This will take place in Stamford-Norwalk JD Courthouse located at the following address: 123 Hoyt Street, Stamford, CT.

Please be aware that there is often more than one case scheduled for a particular date in this court. Please visit www.jud.ct.gov to check for any updates that may be available on this case.

For more information, contact the Office of Victim Services at 1-800-822-8428. For updates about this case or for driving directions to the courthouse, you can visit www.jud.ct.gov.
 
That’s never going to happen. And after she is convicted, she will continue to whine about the unfairness of it all, and defame Jennifer.

Maybe the orphaned children will bring suit in the future, to stop her from slandering their mother....

(You may say I'm a dreamer,
but I'm not the only one....)

jmho ymmv lrr
 
iirc, Pyetranker was one of the attorneys involved in the divorce/child custody fiasco?

Wonder if KW was that always-available-defense-attorney?

But fD was smart enough to know they were too enmeshed for court representation?

(Kent, we're here counting on you -- sing like a canary, Kent, sing!)

jmho ymmv lrr
KW? Did you mean KM?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
3,140
Total visitors
3,224

Forum statistics

Threads
604,184
Messages
18,168,701
Members
232,117
Latest member
xutehosaulle
Back
Top