I am not Sherlock H.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2023
- Messages
- 1,765
- Reaction score
- 16,490
Wow, so if reading this correctly (from above)…….. “JS is now asking about the female figure. JS is testifying (!) that his client said that is her in the raptor and that it was FD.”Back live.
Witness is holding license plates up with tape and adhesive removed. And now the envelope.
Now cross.
JS asked about the license plates. Chevy had not been registered to FD for many years. And these plates had been canceled many years prior.
JS is making a distinction between that 2007 Chevy and FD's newer 2019 model.
JS is now asking about the female figure. JS is testifying (!) that his client said that is her in the raptor and that it was FD.
JS is asking if there are more cameras than there are stops.
JS is asking about the black trash bags, now the black rolled up item. JS asks if he can identify by camera or technology to determine what the white spot on the black item is.
JS is now asking if this witness himself saw someone cart that black mat away. He personally had not seen any footage of that.
Witness said he was focused on the last stop because they believed there was evidence in the drain that hadn't been recovered.
JS is asking if he can determine if it's weathertek or another brand.
JS is asking if this witness saw the rolled up item at the location or on cctv. He did not.
Cross concluded, no redirect.
State has witnesses lined up and ready to be presented.
Recess until 10am tomorrow.
Defendant’s counsel stated this on their client’s behalf and agreed to it?
And no objections or other stipulations incurred? I think I am speechless. MOO