"Originally Posted by Willow Knight May I ask why it must be proved that he killed all four? Thanks."
Having difficulty following ^.
MyBelle, are you saying to convict DDW for killing Mr S per current chg, that prosecutor has to prove he called all four ppl?
Or are you saying something else? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious. Thx in adv.
ETA: Can anyone clarify the post or MB's comment?
sbmBecause the underlying felony is a weapon so they must tie him to the weapon. Not all were killed by the same weapon, imo.
Wint was initially charged with felony murder while armed for the death of SS. We know a bloody ball bat was found and we know SS had been struck in the head. But this evidence alone is not going to get him convicted of all four deaths, imo, because other weapons were used.... JMO....
Having difficulty following ^.
MyBelle, are you saying to convict DDW for killing Mr S per current chg, that prosecutor has to prove he called all four ppl?
Or are you saying something else? Sorry if I'm missing something obvious. Thx in adv.
ETA: Can anyone clarify the post or MB's comment?