As more evidence comes in the claim his brothers did it is sinking faster than a concrete block thrown in water.
The prosecutor seems fully prepared to refute such ridiculous claims.
Why the defense thought the jurors would fall for this has me puzzled. Jurors want to see evidence of such claims instead of weak inuindos.
The defense has been unable to place the brothers at any crime scene and they wont because neither one was involved in the murders or burning vehicles that are only linked to the defendant.
Jmo
One anomaly being the bloody shoe print on Amy's white pants. If I recall, it did not match Daron Wint's shoes. If it was not his shoe print, then whose? A brother, someone else?