Supposedly, SS family did have a gun. Little good did it do them.
I need to respond to this quote.
No matter how well you may prepare, there will always be variables that can render your preparedness useless. This doesn't just happen to families, it happens to communities and even countries.
If a marauder wants what you have, they can... and will use things you've never thought of to accomplish their goals.
History is full of these lessons. Individuals and countries alike.
In this family's case, the Mom and Dad did many things to protect themselves.
They purchased a home in a Very, secure neighborhood. They had two large dogs, they had an alarm system. They owned a legal gun. Mr. Savopoulos took personal self defence using his body very seriously.
No one in this family was engaged in dangerous activity. No illegal drugs, no illicit business.
Yet, they were kidnapped in their own home, tortured and murdered, with their home set ablaze by a former employee of over a decade.
How on earth can you prepare for something like this?
I am sure, that if there was ANY way for Mr. Savopoulos to save his family, he would have done so.
No. The ownership of a gun did not help this family. I personally think that they were ambushed. By complete monsters.
With no way to get to the gun or use the karate training.
However, to the original poster:
Yes, you are correct, their gun ownership did not save them.
But, gun ownership has saved many lives through the years.
Personally, I will never live anywhere, where I cannot own a gun for defence.
With that said, the Monster who kidnapped, tortured, and murdered this family, is one of the most vilest human beings walking this earth.
I am happy that he is in custody.
I hope that he never walks free amongst we unsuspecting people again.