corundogs
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 3,394
- Reaction score
- 7
the trial against dw hasn't finished let alone started:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2015/03/oregon_man_commits_no_crime_bu.html
ok....wtf????????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the trial against dw hasn't finished let alone started:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2015/03/oregon_man_commits_no_crime_bu.html
How long you can hold a person before charging them has long passed imo
JW was the driver. You know, the guy who steers the vehicle while the CEO focuses on other things?
JW was the driver. You know, the guy who steers the vehicle while the CEO focuses on other things?
A little confused.
The burnt car was a 911 Turbo Cabriolet?
If it was from pics I've seen it looks pretty much like any other 911.
Since most people aren't into cars why would we expect that to draw much attention?
A little confused.
The burnt car was a 911 Turbo Cabriolet?
If it was from pics I've seen it looks pretty much like any other 911.
Since most people aren't into cars why would we expect that to draw much attention?
Perfectly said. I cannot stop thinking about this senseless tragedy and all the what-ifs associated. Seeing the pictures with their obituary nearly put me over the edge.
FR, you can hunt for the link. Just click on Skigirl's name in a post, then go to her profile. There you will find all her posts and the beginning sentence of each. You should be able to hunt down the link you seek that way, if not via google. Good luck!
Then how did he end up there dead?
LE did confirm he took it to the home, because it was in the charging documents. Which allowed for DDW to be arrested for 4 felony murders.
Did you read police affidavit? It says video showed a black man.I tried Google already. I found no mention of a "black man" in the video by the news media before Wint was identified as the suspect. Common sense tells you it's impossible to identify the race of a hooded figure in a blurry video. Most of the people on *********** thought the person was a woman. No one knew the race until Wint was identified.
It's a very unusual looking car. I am not into cars, but I would notice that one.
Do you have an inside scoop that the rest of us lack? If so, you can get "certified" as an expert or insider poster. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?65798-Etiquette-amp-Information
From CD:
W-l stated IT is an
employee of Mr. S whose job consisted of transporting Mr. S to and from work and
handling daily assignments given to him by Mr. S.
What? He has been charged already.The trial against DW hasn't finished let alone started:
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2015/03/oregon_man_commits_no_crime_bu.html
IIRC none of them were checked into the hotel. Sounded like they met up in the motel parking lot...
Sorry, but that is actually inaccurate. The wording on the court docs was very specific in that it was not stating as fact JW's story, but instead stating what he stated. Again and again. I have every reason to believe that SS was at his house the whole time because he was found dead there, unless someone tried to get him to go and get out money somewhere else in the meantime, then bring him back to kill him. But let's face it, the only person who assumes JW's accounts to be true of him leaving money in the car vs somewhere else--on the doorstep, inside the house, at the cafe two neighborhoods over, somewhere in Chantilly, etc.--is JW. Clearly he lied his pants off to LE, so they wouldn't suddenly be like, "Oh, JW now says this in his latest version of the story, so let's just go with that." It is pretty clear that ransom money exchanged hands between JW and DW (because half the money was found with DW), but I would feel a little irresponsible taking JW's word on the details in his latest rendition of his story unless I had evidence backing it up. If I were LE. And LE is definitely not saying, or even slightly insinuating, that they think those details are true.
yeah and he's also a liar, according to LE so what exactly is your point?