irishbosoxfan
Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 673
- Reaction score
- 0
You beat me!
I agree with this, and not only that, I didn't see any cards in those pictures, only envelopes. An aside on the woman who took the trash...some people are completely nutty.
Nope, she ripped it-
Uhoh, that sounds like a request for the Blink to post a lill' old photo I posted weeks ago, we decided it was prophetic
http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/mm78/Blink34_photos/WS/100_3485.jpg
don't call it please. I saw this truck while running in my hood, it's a sign, I'll let everyone draw their own reference
Nope, she ripped it-
Uhoh, that sounds like a request for the Blink to post a lill' old photo I posted weeks ago, we decided it was prophetic
http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/mm78/Blink34_photos/WS/100_3485.jpg
don't call it please. I saw this truck while running in my hood, it's a sign, I'll let everyone draw their own reference
George will be motoring to Home Depot in a few minutes to pick up a shredder...
I think the LE is already doing that--listening that is.What's gonna happen next? Someone actually going to go up to the side of the house, possibly in the back yard, and listen through the walls and get a taped conversation or something? This takes the cake as the most bizarre case. OJ case didn't get this nutty.
Anything they find is perfectly admissible in court. This was decided by the US Supreme Court many years ago. No search warrant necessary--if there's evidence LE can use it no problemo.
But the US Supreme Court admitted the evidence from the trash can and it was cocaine residue. Wouldn't that fall under forensics because it has to be tested? Now I have to go and research more!
Someone actually going to go up to the side of the house, possibly in the back yard, and listen through the walls and get a taped conversation or something?
I'm pretty sure I've seen her wearing that hat in a picture--So many pictures though I don't remember where it was