Thank you for your clinical explainations Kavya01. Though there are many times children grow up and it's found that something came up in their genetic dna that they were just 'wired' differently and it had absolutely nothing to do with their upbringing or the way their parents were whatsoever, I'm not so sure this is the case with Casey. Each person must be seen on an 'individual' basis. I don't automatically assume something about a person without having met them and gotten to know them, therefore it's difficult to be an "armchair psychologist" to people I've only seen snippits of when they are on television during a chaotic time in their lives (as far as George, Cindy and Lee go). There is just so much more to the equation that is unknown. From what IS seen and shown, one could very well come to a conclusion that everyone in the Anthony family has serious issues.. based on statements during the trial, statements each has given on video before and after the trial and then through others who may or may not be in good standing with them. These things can all be judged on each one of them, as to their personality and character and each one of us may come up with a different perspective on each one of them
In all fairness.. I'd have to withhold my opinion because I honestly don't have first hand knowledge of any of them. I can say that I don't feel that George or Cindy have been totally up front about everything and I've thought Lee knows more than he's said at times, but that is just my own feelings when they've spoken. I've questioned George's demeaner and his being a detective and having first hand knowledge of decomposition etc. and knowing that if enough time went by there would be no evidence.. because Casey just wouldn't know this without him informing her of that fact, would she? or did he have to inform her? That's always bothered me... that 31 days, was it all Casey's idea? She is so immature I just don't know. (questions.. *sigh* sorry for the ramble)
As far as evidence of Casey and her behavior.. as I said I'm not a mental health specialist by any means, but she does 'seem' to exhibit many sociopathic traits and we have seen quite a bit of her and her behavior over a long period of time as well as her thoughts through pen and paper and videos. I know nothing of her childhood and don't know if I could believe a word she utters.
If her lips are moving she is lying.. she has proven that time and again. She knows her accusations from her childhood can't be proven.. does that make them not true? No. Does it make it so? No. Which is sad. Would that in and of itself cause one to murder their own child then cast the thought of that child out of their mind and just 'remember them fondly" from that point on? In my mind, I don't think so. But that's the problem.. I am not capable of thinking like a mother that would take the life of her own child and until one can put themself in that mindset .. how can one fathom the thought process of one that could go to such extremes .. and if one could do such a thing.. what are the limits? There wasn't enough evidence to convict but that doesn't mean she is innocent. It means she was incarcerated and they jumped the gun to rush to trial after discovering the remains. Had she been 'out' would she have slipped up and ran scared? Talked to someone? Gone somewhere? If they had tapped the phones or followed her would they have learned more? Found someone else involved? We'll never know.. or will we? Time will tell... I hope.
Anyway.. sociopathy, probably. An excuse for murder? Not in my book. Her story of being molested growing up a 'reason' for possibly medicating her child to death? No again. If she realized she had problems.. enough to tell her attorneys about them and say they were an excuse for her actions.. why couldn't she relate those same problems to a therapist? AND if it were an accident.. why the wild goose chase? the nanny? again, no therapist.. there is no rhyme or reason. If it were an accident and she's a sociopath that didn't 'care' because she couldn't empathize or feel for anyone.. would it matter to just speak up and say oh yes she drowned? I don't get it. She feels for herself, right? If she did nothing wrong, and no one was at fault then what's the problem in an accident? The only one she wanted to speak with in jail was her molester.. George, the ex-detective? The one that knew how to get her out of jail? The man with the plan? Was the affair he had a set up so someone would be a witness to say 'accident' again? It's all just too played in to her storyline for no one in her family to even be upset by what was done to them by her defense team for me. But hey.. that's just me looking in the ole' goldfish bowl and scratching the head again. Nothing about this case makes a lot of sense, and when it does they make up something else! lol