CARIIS
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 25,470
- Reaction score
- 10,693
Is this outfit accurate??
WOW Intially there were reports of distress calls so hummmm .
IMO only this makes a lot of sense! So maybe there was a fire after all............But could a bomb casue a fire around and around we go ! But this is very interesting IMO. and just seems to fit the first controlled descent, which is what you do!! and then everything went haywire.....
The pilot of the doomed EgyptAir flight spoke to air traffic control in Egypt for several minutes ,,,,, French television .....
...........the pilot told Cairo control about the smoke which had engulfed parts of the aircraft and decided to make an emergency descent to try to clear the fumes.
.....
.....directly contradicts the official claim that there was no distress call from the plane.The claims follow reports of leaked flight data showing trouble in the cockpit and smoke in a plane lavatory just before the plane crashed.
.....not confirmed by the French air accident investigation agency, the BEA.
.............. pilot of the Egyptair A320 had "a conversation several minutes long" with Cairo air traffic control after the plane ran into difficulties in the early hours of Thursday morning.
........pilot decided to make an “emergency descent”, depressurising the cabin, in an attempt to clear smoke fumes which had invaded the front of the aircraft. (account for windsheild alarms guys ??????)
...... on Thursday, there were contradictory claims about distress calls or signals.
"If they lost the aircraft within three minutes that's very, very quick,"
"They were dealing with an extremely serious incident."
Messages like these "generally mean the start of a fire," ................ I assume they are referring to ACARS!
.....
Greek officials say at 2:24 a.m. local time the flight entered the Athens sector of Greek airspace. Twenty-four minutes later, controllers chatted with the pilot, who appeared to be in good spirits.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...or-several-minutes-before-crash-a7041936.html
But then we get back to the core question why surpress this and who surpressed? Was it the folks that were abusing an aircraft? Was the fire a result of an abused airplane finally collapsing and a fire started. But now I suppose they will say a bomb casue the fire.
This only adds to my "shift" yesterday, and am staying on the mechanical side of the story more and more actually.
What about you guys???
It also "happens" to match no claims made -- moo
WOW Intially there were reports of distress calls so hummmm .
IMO only this makes a lot of sense! So maybe there was a fire after all............But could a bomb casue a fire around and around we go ! But this is very interesting IMO. and just seems to fit the first controlled descent, which is what you do!! and then everything went haywire.....
The pilot of the doomed EgyptAir flight spoke to air traffic control in Egypt for several minutes ,,,,, French television .....
...........the pilot told Cairo control about the smoke which had engulfed parts of the aircraft and decided to make an emergency descent to try to clear the fumes.
.....
.....directly contradicts the official claim that there was no distress call from the plane.The claims follow reports of leaked flight data showing trouble in the cockpit and smoke in a plane lavatory just before the plane crashed.
.....not confirmed by the French air accident investigation agency, the BEA.
.............. pilot of the Egyptair A320 had "a conversation several minutes long" with Cairo air traffic control after the plane ran into difficulties in the early hours of Thursday morning.
........pilot decided to make an “emergency descent”, depressurising the cabin, in an attempt to clear smoke fumes which had invaded the front of the aircraft. (account for windsheild alarms guys ??????)
...... on Thursday, there were contradictory claims about distress calls or signals.
"If they lost the aircraft within three minutes that's very, very quick,"
"They were dealing with an extremely serious incident."
Messages like these "generally mean the start of a fire," ................ I assume they are referring to ACARS!
.....
Greek officials say at 2:24 a.m. local time the flight entered the Athens sector of Greek airspace. Twenty-four minutes later, controllers chatted with the pilot, who appeared to be in good spirits.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...or-several-minutes-before-crash-a7041936.html
But then we get back to the core question why surpress this and who surpressed? Was it the folks that were abusing an aircraft? Was the fire a result of an abused airplane finally collapsing and a fire started. But now I suppose they will say a bomb casue the fire.
This only adds to my "shift" yesterday, and am staying on the mechanical side of the story more and more actually.
What about you guys???
It also "happens" to match no claims made -- moo