TTF14
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 15,466
- Reaction score
- 71,525
WHY does LE think she was killed at PTL? Was that based on DNA evidence they originally thought came from SM's truck, but actually was from HE's car? If so, what kind of DNA evidence was that? It would have to be blood to make an assumption that she was MURDERED at PTL and not just kidnapped from there, right?? And if it was blood, and it was HE's blood, originally thought to be in SM's truck (and enough to indicate death had occurred at PTL??), but it was actually in HE's car, why was she bleeding in her car?
Unless the DNA was only hair, but then if it was only hair, why so sure she was killed there and not just kidnapped from there?
What made them so sure she was killed at PTL??????
I'd like to know how thoroughly HE's apartment was searched for any evidence the Moorers might have been inside and if a murder could have occurred there. Were cadaver dogs used inside her apartment? Were they used on her own car?
How far away is HE's apartment from the pay phone? Could HE have gotten in her car and picked SM up and taken him back to her apt? Could he have walked to her apt?
Unless the DNA was only hair, but then if it was only hair, why so sure she was killed there and not just kidnapped from there?
What made them so sure she was killed at PTL??????
I'd like to know how thoroughly HE's apartment was searched for any evidence the Moorers might have been inside and if a murder could have occurred there. Were cadaver dogs used inside her apartment? Were they used on her own car?
How far away is HE's apartment from the pay phone? Could HE have gotten in her car and picked SM up and taken him back to her apt? Could he have walked to her apt?