I have watched about half of the livestream of the trial and tried to focus strictly on what was presented, leaving out news details of the wrongful death case excluded from trial. This will be judged based on reasonable doubt, and it's not perfect evidence. Still I cannot see how they could reasonably believe that anyone besides Michael Haim was responsible for her death and for concealing the body by burying it in the backyard. If her skeletal remains had never been found (which I believe was his expectation) or had been found anywhere else besides their home, then there MIGHT be some room for some reasonable doubt as to his culpability, but I am not seeing it here.