Seeker
Former Member
Thanks Rat! I've been reading to keep up...got shivers with the "get on with our lives" type of response he gave.
I hope they catch her murderer very soon.
I hope they catch her murderer very soon.
that part kinda gave me the creeps as well.Thanks Rat! I've been reading to keep up...got shivers with the "get on with our lives" type of response he gave.
I hope they catch her murderer very soon.
Thanks Rat! I've been reading to keep up...got shivers with the "get on with our lives" type of response he gave.
I hope they catch her murderer very soon.
There's my Girl! Have you ever heard of another father say such a thing?!
:waitasec: It does kind of ring a bell though............:dance:
BTW posters - Everyone reading are the ones to Thank!
http://www.sun-herald.com/Newsheadline.cfm?headline=8932Is he even going to be living with his kids? Wasn't some of that *advertiser censored* of a little child being raped by an adult or was that just gossip? Regards, if he had any child *advertiser censored* on that computer than the courts should think twice about him being around his own children. They don't even know who murdered that poor little girl and after all of this time I wonder if they will ever find out.
I think that every state should automatically take DNA from each child that is born and put it into a date base. For those of us already here we should have to give a DNA sample so that it can be intered into a data base too. That way everyone's DNA would be in a data base and killers would be easier to catch. The same with fingerprints. I don't know why our finger prints aren't put on our driver license and recorded into a data base. If the goverment would just makes these things mandatory a lot more crimes would be solved.
this is all i could find that detailed exactly what he had.Fullwood's computer was one of 10 confiscated from his home during his daughter's murder investigation. Law enforcement officials found Fullwood had multiple pornographic images on his laptop computer. One expert believed one of the pictures was of a child under 12 years old engaged in a sexual act.
He shouldn't have gotten a deal for having that *advertiser censored*. He should have been charged for the amount of *advertiser censored* that he had on his computer. I don't know what it is with Pros and plea deals. They hand them out like candy.
I've yet to hear this man say that he was wrong for having that junk on his computer...for looking at it and that he is responsible for being in jail and for what he has put his children through.