Any "news" on what happened at the hearing on Thursday? I'm just getting old articles when I search...
TIA!![]()
“I see the defense doing the what is the old saying the best defense is offense right so they are on a relentless media campaign to try the case in the media to paint this crazy scenario where Katherine is completely innocent and who's telling the truth who's saying that she had no involvement whatsoever in his murder in spite of the significant evidence that all of us saw at the trial that she was involved.” “But yet the attorneys for Katherine are non-stop on a media blitz trying to portray her as an innocent princess who's been wronged by the big bad government and it's pretty obvious that that's wrong, right? That that’s a game. They’re playing a game. I believe that ultimately they’re trying to help the Adelsons remain uncharged. They’re going on offense. Even though there is plenty of evidence. So all they have to do is save Katie - because without Katie - she is the buffer, she is the security blanket, she is the person in the middle that is protecting the people who ordered the hit.” – Mentour Lawyer - Live Dan Markel Hearing - Florida vs Katherine Magbanua - Mentour Lawyer
With this Spurious defense , IF it works the beautiful Tara has to leave the case if further prosecutions take place... she will have got KM off (hope not ) on the basis that Charles Adel did a deal with SG directly. So Kawass cannot then defend CJA or anyone else much of the Adelson family.
BTW I'd bet that Donna had to be brought in to OK this form of defense - Charles J A on his own would never allow this to be used in my opinion - it is highly suggestive that the Adelson clan is pulling the strings in the defense strategy.
But consider this -
1. Tara's case is correct - therefore CJA has commissioned a murder for hire.
2. Tara's case is NOT correct - so CJA is allowing perjury to happen in his name in order to protect KM and allow attention to be directed away from him in the short term.
Either way, CJA is guilty of a crime not befitting someone qualified to practice Dentistry in the St off FL and to handle hard anaesthetic drugs given that most of the players in this game are hard core cocaine and Methamphetamine users - Whoa man, dem's hard drugs... so people need to be writing official letters to the Dental Board of Florida about this state of affairs .
- That's you the reader of this , if you live in Florida... write a letter of complaint about CJA. His details are all over the web. The thing that can't be found readily is is dental licence number.
Florida Board of Dentistry » Licensing and Registration- Licensing, Renewals & Information
is where you can get more details on complaints procedure
Kidon G
By the way , in the DOnna emails posted by ML on Ytube , at one point Donna refers to Wendi's then divorce lawyer as Kristin with the I. Guess whom Tara Kawass is in business with ... one Kristen Kawass who is her older sister. and who finished law school a few yrs earlier. My money is that this Kristin of the DONNA spelling is the same person...what are the odds of that ? KM independently selects the sister of the divorce lawyer of Wendi A as her trial lawyer in a murder trial ? Does anyone else know more about this - or is it a random alignment of names that occurs once in a billion years. If you look at the Kawass FL law website you will see that divorce settlements is potentially the sort of work that Kristen could get up to . ML I believe has copies of those sorts of documents and could probably check.
Kidon G.
"Katherine Magbanua was offered an IMMUNITY DEAL, and — presumably following the sage, independent advice of her lawyers — she REFUSED it! WHO REFUSES AN IMMUNITY DEAL IN A CAPITAL MURDER CASE???????? What does this tell us about the conflict of interest of her attorneys and who is pulling their strings??? In my opinion… DAVID OSCAR MARKUS is their puppeteer and they are protecting his client at the expense of Ms. Magbanua and putting her in serious legal jeopardy!!! To me, this is a mockery of the justice system!"
The Dan Markel Case: Katherine Magbanua Turns Down A Deal
Welcome to Ws fancifiction!RE: David Oscar Markus - I agree with your opinion. Penthouse ONE, anyone? In fact, stay tuned for a video on the subject. Hi.
Welcome to Ws fancifiction!
Super Lawyer!...
Top Rated Miami, FL White Collar Crimes Attorney | David Markus | Super Lawyers
Lol. ibm.ENDORSEMENT ALERT!!!
"Welcome back to The SIP. In today’s episode, 1992 Scholar, Sue Suh will be talking with 1990 Scholar, Jason Feldman, co-founder of Vault Health. They’re going to be diving into how Jason has started a men’s health company in the middle of a pandemic and how the company is helping with the COVID-19 crisis. Sue Suh serves as the first chief people officer for Time." - 12/17/2020 | The SIP: Season 2, Episode 5 Transcript - Coca-Cola Scholars Foundation
QUESTION FOR Y'ALL: Is it normal for a CEO to speak this way about his female employee? Feels intimate no? Weird as HELL if you ask me. Wonder what this guy's deal is and if his investors care at all who he hires?
View attachment 304441
P.S. Kills me to say this, but maybe drink Pepsi?
Lol. ibm.
'' My life is a board game. It’s like Chutes and Ladders, I think. I wish it was a bit more like Monopoly, but it’s Chutes and Ladders''
ENDORSEMENT ALERT!!!
"Welcome back to The SIP. In today’s episode, 1992 Scholar, Sue Suh will be talking with 1990 Scholar, Jason Feldman, co-founder of Vault Health. They’re going to be diving into how Jason has started a men’s health company in the middle of a pandemic and how the company is helping with the COVID-19 crisis. Sue Suh serves as the first chief people officer for Time." - 12/17/2020 | The SIP: Season 2, Episode 5 Transcript - Coca-Cola Scholars Foundation
QUESTION FOR Y'ALL: Is it normal for a CEO to speak this way about his female employee? Feels intimate no? Weird as HELL if you ask me. Wonder what this guy's deal is and if his investors care at all who he hires?
View attachment 304441
P.S. Kills me to say this, but maybe drink Pepsi?
Tanks a Tousand for that clarification on the Kristin / Kristen business . I thought it might be too good to be true that such a close link existed between the two lawyers.It's not Kristen Kawass.
"Katherine Magbanua was offered an IMMUNITY DEAL, and — presumably following the sage, independent advice of her lawyers — she REFUSED it! WHO REFUSES AN IMMUNITY DEAL IN A CAPITAL MURDER CASE???????? What does this tell us about the conflict of interest of her attorneys and who is pulling their strings??? In my opinion… DAVID OSCAR MARKUS is their puppeteer and they are protecting his client at the expense of Ms. Magbanua and putting her in serious legal jeopardy!!! To me, this is a mockery of the justice system!"
The Dan Markel Case: Katherine Magbanua Turns Down A Deal