I get that you're looking for verbatim words in quotes rather than "15 girls were involved, Judd said", but the latter constitutes proof on this particular site. (As opposed to something more weaselly such as "sources say".)
That's not even close to proof or even credible evidence.
Fox News told millions that authorities said the two arrested girls had shown no remorse, though this directly contradicted what the sheriff just said about Katelyn in a news conference and what is stated in her arrest affidavit released to news networks.
If 20 newspapers report tomorrow that Judd said Rebecca deserved to die, but curiously none provides an actual quote, not to mention time and place, or a written statement, or video, would you just accept it as true?
Yet by your logic, FOX (or MSNBC or CNN or ...) stating something as a fact is "proof" it is true.
At this point if you're this invested in proving no other students participated, I think the burden of proof may be on you to produce a verbatim quote of Judd saying "no other students participated."
You miss the point entirely.
Had the media stated as "fact" that the sheriff said no more than two kids were involved, I again would ask for evidence here if I noticed its curious absence wherever I looked.
I am saying that those "15 bullies" statements attributed to Judd are entirely unsubstantiated. People simply accept them on faith because they wish to believe them.
May I ask what the overall point here is? I know there is debate about how much bullying played a role, but "drink bleach and die" is pretty overt. And as for Rebecca's other problems, bullies are adept at spotting weakness. That's kind of their gig.
Again, you entirely miss the point. You are thinking as a lawyer representing one of two sides. I am thinking as a social researcher interested in preventing bullying. The truth matters in many ways that have nothing to do with the legal case against the girls.
BTW, many posters on the web questioned why Judd managed to arrest only 2 of the "15 known bullies". And I wonder if there really was 15 students taking part in an unceasing campaign of abuse, how come no parent noticed? And many other perfectly valid questions.
Anyway, this is "Websleuths" -- if people here have no interest in the actual truth, what's the point of the site?
And if you find nothing troubling about a major "fact" repeated all over the mainstream media that no one is able to substantiate, what's the point of even caring about the truth? People who trust blindly whatever they hear on TV make poor detectives.
Finally, it seems impossible for you to imagine anyone who is primarily interested in actual evidence, wherever it leads. If the media start spreading unsubstantiated "facts" blaming Rebecca's step-dad for causing her to kill herself, I will speak up even though I rather dislike the man based on released evidence.
This was the last place I expected people get irked when someone asks for actual evidence. I hoped posters here would find it interesting if they are unable to substantiate a "fact" repeated over and over by much of the media.
Of course I have no desire to impose my passion for truth and evidence on others here; so feel free to ignore me.