I am trying to see if we can narrow people down somehow. Going back to the DNA tests & I am not sure if this all makes sense or helps in anyway. DNA from Somer , & people close to Somer should be back by now. It generally takes 5 to 10 days for DNA to come back. Not sure if is possible or not for there to be absolutely no DNA evidence on her at all from her killer? He would have to be wearing a CSI suit & pray Somer didnt scratch his face. But, if we assume for the sake of argument there is DNA, then we can pretty well conclude that it is not a RSO that has DNA on file, so those people could be ruled out hence no arrest??? If they are swabbing lots of people, I can see how new results would be coming in all the time. Now if there is no evidence of a strangers DNA on her, just the peoples that should be (family, friends, maybe a teacher, etc.) then I can see a problem, narrowing these suspects down and gathering evidence.
In my mind, I have ruled out most RSOs (not sure how up-to-date their info. is). Is there evidence of a strangers DNA? Sandpod was it you who mentioned about an electrician or construction worker of some kind in the neighborhood that LE re-interviewed? Just wondering if they took his DNA? If they did, there must be a strangers DNA they need to identify. If they didnt were they just interviewing to see if he saw Somer or anything suspicious? I guess you couldnt really evaluate if they were really looking at him as a suspect or witness, unless they swabbed him lol! I guess a big clue for us would be if we hear of LE swabbing people. If they are, in my mind, I am willing rule out friends and family. Not fool proof perhaps but the odds are so much better KWIM?