And the internet searches and how many links she clicked. This only shows that SA is fabricating evidence. If neighbor's child dies of chloroform am I responsible? I HAVE searched for this word. KC also searched for shovel. Then we can as well conclude that she wanted to buy a shovel for Caylee and therefor she is a loving mother.
She clicked 84 times! Wow! What an evidence!Well links are there to be clicked.
I have to say "media coverage" because I am forced to watch much of the action on IS or HLN, as my computer tends to overheat when I use it to watch live events...and their coverage is repulsive and ignorant, no matter which side they take, in my opinion.
I never have high expectations that lawyers on the defense side of criminal trials will behave very well toward witnesses, as often they have very little to work with as far as actual evidence or law on their side. So often we see defense teams attacking victims of rape, etc...it is despicable but it is what they do. So JB does not bother me as much as he might otherwise. I think he portrays desperation when he is rude and insinuating with witnesses.
BBMI voted Other and have stopped to follow the full coverage. Reason? The SA's.
Introducing so many trivial details and doing bookkeeping in front of the jury.
They showed tens of items to Dr. Voss just to say that he found ONE decomposing hair.
For hours they introduced dog pictures, unrelated dog video and dog certificates just to say the dog found cadaver odor in car trunk and in the backyard.
Furthermore this showed me that the state is desperately short of evidence and the judge is NOT impartial. He is clearly favoring the SA. Baez rightly objected to the cadaver dog 101 but the judge dismissed it. Then why not let Baez take same number of hours and talk about the unreliability of cadaver dogs? If SA may educate the jury why not DT to do the same?
She visited a site that gives instructions on how to make chloroform 84 times. That's a lot different than just "clicking". Also, it's not simply that she searched for chloroform -- it is the totality of the evidence, including the fact that CHLOROFORM was found in the trunk of her car.
I, too, am amazed at JB's disrespect of just about everyone not on his team. I realize typical defense strategies are contentous, but, golly, does he have to be so rude.I cannot tolerate the disrespect that JB shows prosecution, the Judge, witnesses, and even the jury.
It angers me that he is relying heavily on instructions from his DT, and in the end, is going to take all the credit for anything good that might come to the DT and client, like it's all him, he wasn't picking the brains of his co-counsel.
Regarding the rambling questions when he cross-examines, I am deathly afraid that he is going to wear the jurors' brains out, and that they will forget the points made by the prosecution witnesses. Sure hope that the Pros can refresh the testimony of the state's witnesses in the jurors' minds. .
Did JP allow for all the sidebars when he calculated the time this trial would take?
The OS of DT sucked majorly.
I wish I could stop watching this trial!!! :banghead:
IMO, of course. (I always say that when I think (maybe) I might have been bad!)