You know I admire and respect you highly and all you have consistently done for missing victims but on this I just have a different take.
But the act of the abduction/kidnapping itself by the perps rarely leaves evidence behind no matter who is doing the kidnapping. So many cases are where the victim is gone without a trace of evidence left behind.
While the abduction of Holly left no evidence behind I would guess that the actual crime scene was a house of horrors. May be why they arrested them all once they searched Adams and Autry's properties. At the actual murder site I would think the murder itself was very disorganized.
With this killer I think everywhere he went or took them he made sure no evidence was left behind tying him to the crimes. I even think he may have made sure he murdered them where he knew evidence of the murders wouldn't be found.
It seems that kidnapping a victim is rather easy unfortunately but where the actual murder occurs tends to be sloppy when its meth heads or drug addicts and they will leave a lot of evidence behind.
JMO though and nothing more than that.
I still wub you though and do understand what you are saying. I just don't feel it in this case but I sure have agreed with you on many cases and thought you had them pegged right.
This one just feels different to me for some reason.
Imo, we are looking at someone who is educated, intelligent, and fits in well within the community.