CHERIE.T
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2012
- Messages
- 8,281
- Reaction score
- 33
No, once again, this was not a trial. He used those statements along with all the other evidence presented to determine if the prosecution had probable cause for the arrest and enough evidence for them to present the case to the Grand Jury. This is not some random guy they pulled in off the street, this a judge who is presumably experienced and well-versed enough in the antics, theatrics, spins, prevarications and diversionary tactics of lawyers (whichever side of the divide they happen to fall on) to not be swayed by 'fluff'. If you didn't approve of how the probable cause hearing was conducted then you're really gonna be unhappy when it goes to Grand Jury since - someone correct me if I'm wrong - I understand ONLY the DA gets to put on witnesses and ask questions there and the defense doesn't get a look in.
Nancy A...... Thank you isn't enough.
This isn't hard to understand imoo but worth repeating.