Tuba
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2007
- Messages
- 5,691
- Reaction score
- 65
Well, this is not my theory, it is the latest news on our case that was available. The fact is that the DNA was in 5A and was left by someone whom the police cannot i.d. The return to the kidnapping is due to it being stranger DNA. The nine from the dinner party will have to provide new samples. They are being asked to recall what they were wearing (the photos from the dinner party may help) and produce it.Tuba, a kidnapper would not necessarily leave DNA anyway. Unless there was some kind of bodily fluid left behind--saliva, semen, blood, sweat--there's not going to be DNA from a kidnapper. Absence or presence of "other" DNA doesn't prove or disprove an abductor.
Presence of Madeleine's DNA, on the other hand, in places such as a car trunk or an apartment where she was not in residence, is much more significant.