Lovelymountains
New Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 335
- Reaction score
- 1
Thank you. I heard it right. BY not AT. Interpretations will vary. As well as his decision to ask GZ why are you following me could have and IMO did happen as an out of breath GZ approached and confronted TM. Serino states to the ME examiner in the autopsy report that the resident confronted the unidentified male on pg 13 of the document.
If you believe her testimony here than you believe he said "get off, get off" as well? Yes or No?
When TM says he lost him, I believe he thought he did as the truck was not able to drive between the homes where he ran to, then stopped or walked slower, feeling safer. Part way down the dog path, GZ is back on foot! And catches up to him BY where he lives... Just 70 yards away and TM asks him why are you following me.
IMO- GZ grabs TM and says "what are you doing here", TM says "get off me, get off me" ( you believe RJ) trying to pull away. GZ pulls harder and tries some MMA or police take down and slips on the grass, hits his head, and/or face ( no DNA on TM hands) on one of the water coverings. TM and GM are pulling, pushing each other away or holding on with force, both yelling for help and attention to the altercation. The evidence ( no DNA on TM hands) doesn't support holding GZ sweaty head and slamming it nor covering a saliva and blood covered full screaming mouth. TM gets GZ to lose his grip, but GZ still has a hold of his shirt and pulled away from TM's body , sees his opportunity to pull his loaded gun and shoot so he doesn't get away. He didn't.
IMO OMO
I believe this to be the most logical scenario as to how this death happened. It fits all of the physical evidence and some of the witness testimony. As to why some witness testimony does not fit this, witness testimony is notoriously unreliable. I think that hearing something, i.e. RJ, might be easier to remember accurately than something of which you had a fleeting glance, i.e. Mr. Good's ten seconds.
IMO