iucpa, wral is not live that I can find
they DO have a twitter update:
http://www.wral.com/specialreports/michelleyoung/?sc_int_cid=2012_02_young_trial_226
Try NBC
http://www2.nbc17.com/video/live/
iucpa, wral is not live that I can find
they DO have a twitter update:
http://www.wral.com/specialreports/michelleyoung/?sc_int_cid=2012_02_young_trial_226
Well some examples of behavior leading away from APD would be appreciated. Other than mimicked emotion for his wife/daughter I have seen far more of his behavior consistent with that of someone afflicted with cluster b personality disorders - possibly co-morbid.I've just read books, I'm no expert though, but from what I gather since sociopaths have little/no remorse, JY would either not be so wound up that he lashed out at Gracie - since he doesn't have a history of screaming at strangers like that - or he would get very angry and kill her. I don't think there would be any middle ground.
Mainly I just don't think JY is a sociopath at all whether or not he interacted with Gracie, killed Michelle/Rylan, etc.
JMO
Disordered people do not blow up constantly but they are angry constantly - their anger is always just below the surface and it is easily tripped.Right, but why would he have lashed out at Gracie? That's not his normal behavior and could be explained as him being wound up because he had just committed a murder and was not in his normal state of mind. He wasn't known for lashing out at strangers like that.
If he were a sociopath I don't think he would have been wound up about committing the murder. Regardless he would have known how stupid it would be to call attention to himself like that and would have only lashed out if he lost his cool. Either way there is no other evidence or testimony that JY is a sociopath, but he has been referred to as one several times so I am giving my alternate point of view.
I don't think Gracie actually saw JY in the first place though. I think she encountered some other idiot who couldn't control his temper.
Forcing the jury to look @ items in the courtroom, without benefit of discussion and comparison and pointing out what area is of interest, might serve to confuse some of them more. They will have to use their memory of what they just observed and we know from multiple examples some people can't retain anything beyond what they heard or saw 10 seconds ago. Some see it and get it wrong or even backwards.
Courtesy of Wolfpack:
Jury box is set up like this:
A1, A2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
A3, A4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Back to bars on 17? Any place live?
Forcing the jury to look @ items in the courtroom, without benefit of discussion and comparison and pointing out what area is of interest, might serve to confuse some of them more. They will have to use their memory of what they just observed, and we know from multiple examples some people can't retain anything beyond what they heard or saw all of 10 seconds ago. Some see it and get it wrong or even backwards. I can't stand this rule and I know the judge doesn't like it either.
As for inventory, can't the jury ask for testimony to be read back to them?
Back to bars on 17? Any place live?
Does anyone have a link to WRAL's coverage? I can't hear the ABC11 feed.
As for inventory, can't the jury ask for testimony to be read back to them?
Forcing the jury to look @ items in the courtroom, without benefit of discussion and comparison and pointing out what area is of interest, might serve to confuse some of them more. They will have to use their memory of what they just observed, and we know from multiple examples some people can't retain anything beyond what they heard or saw all of 10 seconds ago. Some see it and get it wrong or even backwards. I can't stand this rule and I know the judge doesn't like it either.
can the jurors take notes while they are looking at said requested items?
Of course!
yes if they request it.