Haleigh's little brother "Man in black took my sissy."

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
All I can say is that I am glad Blake's grandmother (Patty Davis) didn't hesitate to believe what the 2yo told her and put stock into it!! He was right.

I will take the word of a 4yo over the carp we have been hearing from the 17yo in this case! She makes no sense at all half the time.

Right now, I don't know what to believe coming from the adults in this case.
 
All I can say is that I am glad Blake's grandmother (Patty Davis) didn't hesitate to believe what the 2yo told her and put stock into it!! He was right.

I will take the word of a 4yo over the carp we have been hearing from the 17yo in this case! She makes no sense at all half the time.

Right now, I don't know what to believe coming from the adults in this case.

Well,if that isn't the truth.I still feel like she's a unrefined KC as far as in the truth dept.IMO And this is what is disturbing me,also.
 
I know what you mean Sissy. I just posted on the LE Presser thread that I don't even bother tuning into those because they seem to be all defensive and they never offer much of anything. People (and the press) will lose interest which is a disservice to Haleigh. I get the distinct feeling that LE does not want any help on this case, they can handle it just fine, thank you very much. I had so much faith in LE in Maddie's case too but, like you about this case, I am not so sure anymore.

Poor Haleigh.

I have had this feeling since day 1 (hate that expression). Been griping about since then too. I have gotten the distinct feeling that LE there would be just as happy if Media, volunteers and everyone else would just pack up and go home. They, LE do not like the microscope they are under and haven't. They are rude, arrogant and condescending in their pressers and I do not like it. Complete opposite of OCSO, at least they OCSO acted like they appreciated the help people were offering. JMO.
 
Maybe he wouldn't need to...but did anyway. ;)
Must have forgotten his flashlight or just didn't care about illuminating the house. ;) Have we ever found out what window Misty took the blanket down from? That would also let in more moonlight.
 
Must have forgotten his flashlight or just didn't care about illuminating the house. ;) Have we ever found out what window Misty took the blanket down from? That would also let in more moonlight.

haven't heard for sure, but i'd think it would be safe to assume that it was from the master bedroom.
 
If Haleigh wet herself, is it too far to assume she went into the kitchen, turned on the light, and removed her shirt and put it in the dirty laundry?
 
haven't heard for sure, but i'd think it would be safe to assume that it was from the master bedroom.
You're probably right, if it was used to block out light during the day. And all three of them are asleep in that room with the full moon shining in through the window? :waitasec: Maybe I'm odd but the nights when the moon is like that I have to make sure the blinds are closed tightly or I can't sleep! MOO
 
If Haleigh wet herself, is it too far to assume she went into the kitchen, turned on the light, and removed her shirt and put it in the dirty laundry?
Wouldn't her bed and whatever else she was wearing be wet too? Which, if this is what happened, I could see somebody getting just a little upset that she had to get up and change the bedding again. MOO
 
It kind of contradicts itself, imo. Wearing dark clothing, maybe not all black but at night can be mistaken for black, and then turning on a kitchen light doesn't make sense unless the perp knew there wasn't an adult in the house. And Jr. is old enough that if he had gotten a good look at the perp could've given a description what he looked like. It's still confusing.

My thought is this...
If a man went to all the trouble of wearing all black in order to camoflauge himself in the night to watch this house to abduct a child out of said house in the middle of the night. Obviously he is watching the house, 1. sees the lights go out and knows everyone is in bed and waits until he thinks they are sleeping and he waits some more just to be sure.

Now he decideds to go..grabs a cinder block being very careful not to make any noise, ropes it to the screen, again not to make any noise, he has watched the place, doesn't want to wake the adult. Picks the backdoor lock because according to Misty it was locked, has to do this quietly. Intruder dressed in black, flips on kitchen light ( we know the light had to be turned on because in Misty's interview she said she noticed the kitchen light on and that is what led her to the kitchen and she noticed the back door open) makes his way silently (previous occupant said this could not happen due to creaky floors) to room where Misty, Haleigh and JR were asleep. Depending on which story of Misty's....
Intruder then walks into dark bedroom makes out Haleigh, reaches in a bed either with JR or Misty in it and picks up Haleigh. Obviously never waking Haleigh enough that she could alert Misty something was wrong. Could JR have been awakened? Yes and he was scared.
This Intruder then has to make his way carrying Haleigh back out of the creaky floored house carrying a 5 year old child without waking Haleigh up, hand over her mouth? Misty or any neighbors.
The kitchen light on means, why wear black? You flip a kitchen light on, that means neighbors could see in watching you, the Intruder abducting a child in the middle of the night, witnesses in the house if they wake up can identify you. Plus how did he know where the kichen light switch was?
JMO.
 
Hi, We learned LE did question or talk to Jr right away, which I would take to mean within hours of arriving on the scene, before anyone could get to him.

If he said nothing at that time about men/man in black to the officers, the police are probably raising their eyebrow now, hearing this. It would be similar to Misty and Ron saying LE used the word 'cleared' re their Lie Detector tests.

What I question is a 4 yr old using the word 'black'. It seems out of his age group to think like that. To me it sounds more like an adult putting thoughts in his head.

So many times we hear about the remarkable things young children say and do. I think that is by far the exception to the norm. We know hardly anything about this little guy except his family and community environment and the lifestyle of his parents. That doesn't bode well with me in giving him any edge to knowing things the average child in America would.

I could be all wrong of course ;} And I mean nothing against this little guy in my saying that.
 
so let me get this straight: junior saw a man wearing black? obviously, he was awake...so a 3yr old can wake up out of a deep sleep and a 17yr old can't?

if i'm going to "sneak" into someone's house to abduct a child, yes i would wear black, but i would not turn on the kitchen light! no wonder LE keeps on questioning MC!
 
Wouldn't her bed and whatever else she was wearing be wet too? Which, if this is what happened, I could see somebody getting just a little upset that she had to get up and change the bedding again. MOO

Change it or put the child in bed with you and just change her bed in the morning.
 
My thought is this...
If a man went to all the trouble of wearing all black in order to camoflauge himself in the night to watch this house to abduct a child out of said house in the middle of the night. Obviously he is watching the house, 1. sees the lights go out and knows everyone is in bed and waits until he thinks they are sleeping and he waits some more just to be sure.

Now he decideds to go..grabs a cinder block being very careful not to make any noise, ropes it to the screen, again not to make any noise, he has watched the place, doesn't want to wake the adult. Picks the backdoor lock because according to Misty it was locked, has to do this quietly. Intruder dressed in black, flips on kitchen light ( we know the light had to be turned on because in Misty's interview she said she noticed the kitchen light on and that is what led her to the kitchen and she noticed the back door open) makes his way silently (previous occupant said this could not happen due to creaky floors) to room where Misty, Haleigh and JR were asleep. Depending on which story of Misty's....
Intruder then walks into dark bedroom makes out Haleigh, reaches in a bed either with JR or Misty in it and picks up Haleigh. Obviously never waking Haleigh enough that she could alert Misty something was wrong. Could JR have been awakened? Yes and he was scared.
This Intruder then has to make his way carrying Haleigh back out of the creaky floored house carrying a 5 year old child without waking Haleigh up, hand over her mouth? Misty or any neighbors.
The kitchen light on means, why wear black? You flip a kitchen light on, that means neighbors could see in watching you, the Intruder abducting a child in the middle of the night, witnesses in the house if they wake up can identify you. Plus how did he know where the kichen light switch was?
JMO.
Your post just makes too much sense! :clap::clap::clap:
 
Change it or put the child in bed with you and just change her bed in the morning.
So if you got up in the middle of the night to change the child's clothes, then you'd know she didn't have the shirt on that you told LE she did, right? :) MOO
 
Change it or put the child in bed with you and just change her bed in the morning.

Remember, they only have the 2 blankets and if Haleigh was in bed with JR, there is 1 blanket, Misty had the blanket off the window. So, if Haleigh wet, that means Haleigh's and JR's blanket is wet and Misty is going to have to get up in the middle of the night and do laundry again. Don't think so. I think she would change Haleighs clothes and put Haleigh and JR in bed with Misty and her dry blanket off the window.
 
So if you got up in the middle of the night to change the child's clothes, then you'd know she didn't have the shirt on that you told LE she did, right? :) MOO

If Haleigh wet her bed and she changed clothes, but this would affect JR too unless Misty just let him sleep in a wet bed.
 
Remember, they only have the 2 blankets and if Haleigh was in bed with JR, there is 1 blanket, Misty had the blanket off the window. So, if Haleigh wet, that means Haleigh's and JR's blanket is wet and Misty is going to have to get up in the middle of the night and do laundry again. Don't think so. I think she would change Haleighs clothes and put Haleigh and JR in bed with Misty and her dry blanket off the window.
You're right, she would've run out of blankets ~ and yet the perp sneaks in (on the creaky floors ;)) after they're all in bed together and gets Haleigh out of there without waking Misty up ~ after she's already been awakened to change Haleigh's clothes. :waitasec:
 
If Haleigh wet her bed and she changed clothes, but this would affect JR too unless Misty just let him sleep in a wet bed.
I think we're just as confused about this whole story as we were over a week ago! :) About what Jr. said though, I think it could be something he's imagined (like the boogey men kind of thing). MOO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
288
Total visitors
399

Forum statistics

Threads
609,769
Messages
18,257,729
Members
234,756
Latest member
ChaChap
Back
Top