SeriouslySearching
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 35,527
- Reaction score
- 262
And another way to look at that is he has everything to hide (which is why we are checking into it).
Now...see that is where I figured it out to be, too.snipped
http://www.bing.com/maps/default.as...dir=0&alt=-1000&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&encType=1
OK I am confused as to where exactly 116 Tyler actually is located by these maps. Where JWG has it located when I do street view...it comes up as 168 Tyler. There seems not to be a 116 Tyler on either map. Could someone help me out here?
If his house is on the little road between Buchanan and Green, then it would place it behind Haleigh's. Correct? This would mean the dogs did go right near or to their house after leaving the pond, Correct?
http://www.bing.com/maps/default.as...dir=0&alt=-1000&phx=0&phy=0&phscl=1&encType=1
OK I am confused as to where exactly 116 Tyler actually is located by these maps. Where JWG has it located when I do street view...it comes up as 168 Tyler. There seems not to be a 116 Tyler on either map. Could someone help me out here?
If his house is on the little road between Buchanan and Green, then it would place it behind Haleigh's. Correct? This would mean the dogs did go right near or to their house after leaving the pond, Correct?
So we have the intitial 911 giving their address so we know that someone in LE was there and talked to them soon after it was called in. We haven't figured out why they were at that address to my knowledge. Wasn't this rather a mystery?
Very helpful! It means that the dogs tracked right near or to his house after leaving the pond, if we can trust the dogs!This is from Google Map. It actually looks rather far, but, I've seen some rather nice pictures taken by someone local that give a wonderful "feel" for the area and it's quite close.
The poster posts on another forum, so I won't mention where. She did a wonderful job providing pictures of the area. Apparently though, it is exactly .2 of a mile from Ron's MH to the home on Tyler Lane. (There is a picture taken from Tyler Street, and you can actually see Ron's MH through the trees).
Not sure if this was helpful or not.... lol
If people are using this Zillow entry as evidence that the Croslin's are moving, it would be good to look through ALL the info. at the entry which includes the following:
Last sale and tax info
Sold 09/19/2008:
$50,000
2008 Property Tax:
$165
That pix and info. has been up there since the beginning of this case, and many moons ago someone did further research and determined that this is most likely the date on which it was transferred into Lindsey Croslin's name.
What? No one said anything about them moving. If you would have read my post it said:
" I will see if I can find the realtors site I found this morning from when they bought it in 08"
I'd use the birth date from the Court. I found the same DOB in several counties. I'd hope the legal system has the correct DOB on the people in the system.
What's posted on Social Networking sites are not something I would call valid, at least mine isn't!Can I post this info? IF not, I know...mod's delete and sorry.
Thomas Hank Croslin Jr (Misty's brother)DOB Sept 26, 1986
Occupation: Does drywall
This is what i got for this area.. using the GIS map to confirm the locations
Breathlife! Fancy seeing you here!
I just sent someone a message not even 15 minutes ago asking if she had a link to your map you had made. It was such a wonderful reference. Is it still online? If so, would you mind either posting a link or PM'ing it to me? I lost my link awhile ago.
Thank you so much! :blowkiss:
IMO Hank Jr. didn't fly under the radar, he was probably questioned in depth just like the rest of the family was.the way I see it "no news is good news"... maybe Hank Jr has nothing to hide>
IMO Hank Jr. didn't fly under the radar, he was probably questioned in depth just like the rest of the family was.
Now, six months later he becomes involved in an altercation with his brother in-law and he now comes to the forefront of discussion on possible involvement by sluethers, NOT by LE<-------lets keep this in mind.