Kapua
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2014
- Messages
- 4,757
- Reaction score
- 34,239
her phone, laptop, wallet, car stereo all missing
Hmmm. Maybe MPD was able to link SC to these missing items.
her phone, laptop, wallet, car stereo all missing
Exactly. But it seems extremely odd to me that the clothes and jawbone were left in plain sight at a location that does not corroborate SC's already ridiculously weak alibi. He said he lost sight of her @ Twin Falls, so does he want us to believe that someone apprehended her, took her back to Honomanu and killed her there? And how would that mysterious other person escape the wrath of Charli's pit-bull mix dog, Nala, who was found without a scratch in Nahiku, even farther back toward Hana? From day one, the placement of evidence has made zero sense to me. It's just bizarre.
If he wanted to match evidence to the story, you would think he would plant it closer to twin falls (the last place he saw her at), not all the way back to where his truck was supposedly stranded. Why would Charli have ended up all the way back there if the story was true? Had he left her near twin falls, and left her car near the area, he might have a leg to stand on. IMO, if it is not partially true, the story was to account for anyone possibly seeing him in that area when he disposed of the body, and to account for any phone pings.She might not left Haiku. SC went with her family 2/11 to area clothes found 2/13. He might put evidence later to match story he told.
Just a theory but perhaps maybe he needed to take the heat out of Haiku and take it back to Hana. He plants the evidence. Perhaps an after the fact tool is what is being used to link SC to the Jawbone.Exactly. But it seems extremely odd to me that the clothes and jawbone were left in plain sight at a location that does not corroborate SC's already ridiculously weak alibi. He said he lost sight of her @ Twin Falls, so does he want us to believe that someone apprehended her, took her back to Honomanu and killed her there? And how would that mysterious other person escape the wrath of Charli's pit-bull mix dog, Nala, who was found without a scratch in Nahiku, even farther back toward Hana? From day one, the placement of evidence has made zero sense to me. It's just bizarre.
That's what I've believed for a while (taking the heat away from Haiku), but why take it back to the place he claims he fixed his truck? That just implicates him even more, seeing as he claims he saw her headlights (very distinctive ones, not to be confused easily with another vehicle) until Twin Falls. The only reason I can come up with is he returned to an already searched area figuring it wouldn't be searched again. ???Just a theory but perhaps maybe he needed to take the heat out of Haiku and take it back to Hana. He plants the evidence. Perhaps an after the fact tool is what is being used to link SC to the Jawbone.
Just a theory but perhaps maybe he needed to take the heat out of Haiku and take it back to Hana. He plants the evidence. Perhaps an after the fact tool is what is being used to link SC to the Jawbone.
2/9
8:30pm He said Charli got to his house.
2am He called girlfriend.
Don't know if he has alibi like someone see him get home.
2/10
7am He had work at Mana
2/11 He went to Keanae with her family.
He had a lot of time.
That's as good a theory as any, but why tell the broken-down/stuck truck story at all? Why not say, yes, I spoke to her the other night, but I haven't seen her since two weeks ago Thursday. And why not dispose of the evidence as opposed to staging it? He truly is an idiot. This again reminds me of Scott Peterson, who told the police exactly where he went "fishing" without a fishing pole, exactly where he disposed of poor Laci and Conner. Did SC want to be caught?
If Charli said nothing to anybody about where she was headed why say anything to anybody? Just say "Nope, haven't seen her for weeks
"
3rd pic Steven Capobianco instagram 4 weeks ago http://ink361.com/app/users/ig-266221777/chunk_obutter/photos