"Hotel management told CNS that the doors to the roof were locked and had alarms, but that someone could otherwise have accessed the tank."
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/02/elisa_lam_body_found_cecil_hotel_dtla_downtown_los_angeles.php
I wish the media would have given the direct quote from hotel management. As it is, it's basically the media telling us what they said.
It's interesting that from the above statement at the link given, 'doors' (plural) and 'alarms' (plural) are mentioned.
Leading one to believe then that there is more than one door to the roof and more than one alarm. Why would mg'ment say doors/alarms if more than one of each does not exist? (If they actually said it the way that media presents it). We see the alarmed door with no lock. Where's the locked door?
And then... somewhere in these threads is the link to the info from LE saying that the door was not locked but had an alarm.
LE has also said that the alarm goes to hotel management, not to them.
And doors to a highrise roof is not supposed to be locked?
Yet, in that statement above at the link, hotel management said the doors to the roof were locked.
Soooooo.... which is it??
My guess is like some others have mentioned... that the door/s were not locked. And the alarm on the one door may not even have been there prior to the discovery of Elisa's body. Perhaps the alarm was there before but seldom used. The seeming discrepancy in info given between hotel mg'ment and LE 'could' be indicative of one or more covering for each other.
And regardless of whether or not the door/s were locked/alarmed at any point
after Elisa went missing, does not (IMO) prove they were when she went missing.
Anyone could claim anything now, and how would anyone else know for sure?