Please... w/all due respect... please look at what the poster is saying.
They would be a hazard for a cyclist, but not a jogger ... and the cyclist didn't move the bikes that he saw at 12:20.
The trail is 10 feet wide.
Yes I can picture that.
But these two were adults or one adult and one younger person, which means someone probably had access to a car...so why bike awkwardly to a lake to catch tiddlers?
Also, allegedly Elizabeth and Lyric were the only two cyclists caught on cctv that day, in all of Evansdale.
Your childhood determination (mine too, maybe I tried to bike holding a hockey stick or a tennis raquet once, it seems familiar) doesn't alter the statistical likliehood of the girls dumping their bikes in the exact same spot as two far away fishermen, as being one in a million, literally.
Add that in to chances that a grown male American adult would choose to bike anywhere voluntarily holding a fishing rod, and you've got reasonable doubt in my book.
Some things I just can't get past and the above are good examples. Alone, maybe. Together...it's just too much.
I'm think the bikes belonged to the girls, and/or the perps (staging purposes). I think they had just been laid down when TG went by, and I think they were rearranged when he left. And there they sat until someone official went and looked for them.
:cow:
I know you didn't ask me, but I want to answer. :great:
In my opinion, not a chance!
1) The fisherman were grown men. Why would they ride bikes to go fishing instead of driving a car?
2) The bikes TG saw were in the EXACT SAME SPOT as the bikes the searchers found, which belonged to the girls.
3) The fisherman were on the opposite side of the lake. (Sure, they could have meandered around, but why not move their bikes with them?)
4) Is it even possible to ride a bike with a fishing pole and a tackle box?
5) The chances of two bikes that were NOT the girls' bikes being discarded in the EXACT SAME SPOT on the EXACT SAME DAY that the girls' bikes WERE discarded there, in a park that is rarely used for bike riding (per Ollipop), have to be so astronomically miniscule that I'd call it virtually impossible.
I know you didn't ask me, but I want to answer. :great:
In my opinion, not a chance!
1) The fisherman were grown men. Why would they ride bikes to go fishing instead of driving a car?
2) The bikes TG saw were in the EXACT SAME SPOT as the bikes the searchers found, which belonged to the girls.
3) The fisherman were on the opposite side of the lake. (Sure, they could have meandered around, but why not move their bikes with them?)
4) Is it even possible to ride a bike with a fishing pole and a tackle box?
5) The chances of two bikes that were NOT the girls' bikes being discarded in the EXACT SAME SPOT on the EXACT SAME DAY that the girls' bikes WERE discarded there, in a park that is rarely used for bike riding (per Ollipop), have to be so astronomically miniscule that I'd call it virtually impossible.
Were both girls riding girl's bikes vs. boy's bikes. ?
Are the bikes in the video girls' or boys' bikes?
Yes I can picture that.
But these two were adults or one adult and one younger person, which means someone probably had access to a car...so why bike awkwardly to a lake to catch tiddlers?
Also, allegedly Elizabeth and Lyric were the only two cyclists caught on cctv that day, in all of Evansdale.
Your childhood determination (mine too, maybe I tried to bike holding a hockey stick or a tennis raquet once, it seems familiar) doesn't alter the statistical likliehood of the girls dumping their bikes in the exact same spot as two far away fishermen, as being one in a million, literally.
Add that in to chances that a grown male American adult would choose to bike anywhere voluntarily holding a fishing rod, and you've got reasonable doubt in my book.
Some things I just can't get past and the above are good examples. Alone, maybe. Together...it's just too much.
I'm think the bikes belonged to the girls, and/or the perps (staging purposes). I think they had just been laid down when TG went by, and I think they were rearranged when he left. And there they sat until someone official went and looked for them.
:cow:
There is a link to where LE says where the bikes were found, but I can't search for it now. I know we discussed this in the earlier threads.
My reason for thinking the bikes TG saw (if they belonged to the girls) could not have been in the same location as when LE found them is simple - TG saw them laying across a path, but LE found them leaning against a fence. So if the bikes TG saw actually were Lyric and Lizzie's, they were moved after he saw them. JMO
I totally don't get why people are saying adults wouldn't ride a bike. Is New England the only part of the country where people still get around by means other than cranking up a car????
If the bikes were confirmed to be at the location where they were found at 4 PM as early as 12:27, why do official reports state 2:00 PM?
Yes I can picture that.
But these two were adults or one adult and one younger person, which means someone probably had access to a car...so why bike awkwardly to a lake to catch tiddlers?
Also, allegedly Elizabeth and Lyric were the only two cyclists caught on cctv that day, in all of Evansdale.
Your childhood determination (mine too, maybe I tried to bike holding a hockey stick or a tennis raquet once, it seems familiar) doesn't alter the statistical likliehood of the girls dumping their bikes in the exact same spot as two far away fishermen, as being one in a million, literally.
Add that in to chances that a grown male American adult would choose to bike anywhere voluntarily holding a fishing rod, and you've got reasonable doubt in my book.
Some things I just can't get past and the above are good examples. Alone, maybe. Together...it's just too much.
I'm think the bikes belonged to the girls, and/or the perps (staging purposes). I think they had just been laid down when TG went by, and I think they were rearranged when he left. And there they sat until someone official went and looked for them.
:cow:
I think we just have 2 conflicting official reports. The Black Hawk County Sheriff's spokesperson says 3:25. The Iowa Criminal Investigation Bureau (I'm sure I got that wrong -- but the STATE organization, not the County) says 2:00.
I know you didn't ask me, but I want to answer. :great:
In my opinion, not a chance!
1) The fisherman were grown men. Why would they ride bikes to go fishing instead of driving a car?
2) The bikes TG saw were in the EXACT SAME SPOT as the bikes the searchers found, which belonged to the girls.
3) The fisherman were on the opposite side of the lake. (Sure, they could have meandered around, but why not move their bikes with them?)
4) Is it even possible to ride a bike with a fishing pole and a tackle box?
5) The chances of two bikes that were NOT the girls' bikes being discarded in the EXACT SAME SPOT on the EXACT SAME DAY that the girls' bikes WERE discarded there, in a park that is rarely used for bike riding (per Ollipop), have to be so astronomically miniscule that I'd call it virtually impossible.
Don't yell at me but, link?
1. Link please? We do not know the ages of the people fishing, TG noticed them. And really many 13-15 y/o boys are as big as grown men.
This is just a general post, but I'm surprised people make definitive statements about fishing, yet aren't fishermen themselves. I would have no qualms with walking around a lake fishing, moving around it casting as I went. I would have no qualms with riding my bike with my fishing gear. It's what kids in the Midwest do.
BBM I remember the auction house guy saying they were the only bicyclists caught on his CCTV, but as to all the CCTV's in town??? Do you have a link please?
Who moved the bikes, and when, is crucially important to figuring out what time the girls vanished.
On the face of it, if the bikes were confirmed at 2pm (link pls tia) then Tammy's guy who saw them at 2.30 must be ruled out.
Didnt we decide that was a typo?
Didn't NCMC also say Lyric was 5'11"?