drmrgrl
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2022
- Messages
- 1,091
- Reaction score
- 4,144
Sounded more like a tire screechIf this scream could be heard from such a distance, I am wondering why the surviving victims did not hear it? Maybe sleeping deeply???
Sounded more like a tire screechIf this scream could be heard from such a distance, I am wondering why the surviving victims did not hear it? Maybe sleeping deeply???
I did reply, but unfortunately, my response was counted as snarky and deleted. I apologize if you took it that way. I didn't mean to be snarky at all. My response is that I see the miscommunication - I think we were addressing two different parts of the issue. As you know, one court case does not an argument make, and we'd have to have all the facts before we could really throw downRespectfully...
Idaho is a one party state:
Section 18-6702 – Idaho State Legislature
Here is some info on expectation of privacy
and SCOTUS case law:![]()
expectation of privacy
www.law.cornell.edu
![]()
Charles KATZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
www.law.cornell.edu
IMHO what I wrote originally applies both at a state level and law of the land.
IMO accomplice perhapsThe Linda Lane capture of the Elantra - poses problems
- for the hiding inside waiting theory
- the waiting in the bush theory
This confuses me as to whether the person knew the occupants were home by other means other than visual sightings. Following on social media??
Meaning they are not hiding in bushland before the occupants got home.
Maybe they did observe them at other times and knew the layout and who was in each bedroom.
But to drive into the area after they were all home - how did they know??? MOO
To me, this was an intentional omission. Either they don't know, or they know but don't want that to filter out possible vehicles, because plates can be changed easily.I find it strange the way the Moscow Police have worded the info re: license plate on the sought after white 2011-2013 hyundai elantra: “unknown license plate”. Was it an Idaho plate or out of state? Or is that also unknown? They have not clarified that one way or the other.
Their statement isn't definitive. I believe they use the words "are believed to have arrived home by..."I don't believe LE has said how they know X & E arrived home at the time they are saying. It could have very well been the same camera, but I don't think they have acknowledge that.
I would think he'd be smart enough to know better. all it takes is a little. Ted Bundy thought the VW was clean, too, and that was before all the high tech search tools were available.Also, I would think that a perp who methodically plans out a crime like this might have prepped his vehicle by covering seat in and floor in advance with a liner he would later trash or burn.
True, but they had to get that time from somewhere, correct?Their statement isn't definitive. I believe they use the words "are believed to have arrived home by..."
probably. you're lucky. Even if your stuff is locked down, you can usually count on a friend to have theirs open, and you tagged, and bingo. And once you do that, you friend them, esp if they have. large following, and then you're really in.i did that site aswel out of curiosity and nothing for me popped up, oddly. Is it because my IG/fbook are private? A bunch of guys who have similar features otherwise.
is there a link that says both heard something?The downstairs roommates were in seperate bedrooms, correct? It’s interesting that both heard something from different rooms.
If the perp heard movement from down there, that might explain him exiting ASAP.
my theory is that he'd 'visited' the house previously (read: done a B&E or two to make himself at home) and left some well-placed cameras for his own viewing pleasure, then took them when he finished the deed. If he's into watching, he might have even been able to record the murders, but that's evidence he probably doesn't want to hold onto imo.I've theorized that the perp might be an outdoorsman. This would help explain familiarity with and possession of the knife, ability to escape undetected on foot and travel a safe distance in the dark and cold conditions, ability to stalk and track habits and behavior of victims. In addition to this, I wonder if the perp could have set up an outdoor "trail cam" up in a tree aimed at the back of the house. Any hunter in the area would be familiar with these, and it could provide footage of what was happening indoors.
There are many videos on YouTube and on the internet that speculate about a trail cam, that has been speculated on for a while.I've theorized that the perp might be an outdoorsman. This would help explain familiarity with and possession of the knife, ability to escape undetected on foot and travel a safe distance in the dark and cold conditions, ability to stalk and track habits and behavior of victims. In addition to this, I wonder if the perp could have set up an outdoor "trail cam" up in a tree aimed at the back of the house. Any hunter in the area would be familiar with these, and it could provide footage of what was happening indoors.
I have theories and a profile, but it's all imo and my imagination added. I hope LE is on a trail...Welp, just for the record I’m going to state that I’ve been following this case for a month, have dove into every piece of information available about the murders , the victims , etc. and….
I can confidently say that have zero theories about who did this or why.
Anyone else ?!?!
Moo, I agree. We have to conjecture that LE knows more about the car and it’s owner- they have provided full details of the vehicle color, make and model, it’s oddly specific without providing surveillance video evidence. Perhaps they have an inkling of who may have had a similar car within the community or the victims circle of acquaintances barring a random serial killer theory. The car probably contains evidence of some sort (victims DNA) if we believe that it was the getaway vehicle.I think LE knows who has a car like that but they cannot find it at the moment. JM2 I feel that's why they are asking for the public's help but trying to remain tight-lipped at the same time. JM2
Just what is within this radius that is relevant to this case?
Intro:
AB: “Towns 24 miles away...”
* Magic number is 22 - 28 ish miles, I’ve mentioned in other cases, fwiw, but this usually references disposal. Just stood out.
Idk, haven’t watched video yetJust what is within this radius that is relevant to this case?