CSIDreamer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 9,873
- Reaction score
- 79,852
IMO, there is quite alot of evidence of ineffective counsel without Lori having to say anything at all![]()
She says it best when she says nothing at all. Jmo
IMO, there is quite alot of evidence of ineffective counsel without Lori having to say anything at all![]()
IIRC the storage unit place told Nate Eaton to let LVD know she still owed fees on the locker (back in January ish).FWIW, I also do not understand LVD and CD putting all JJV and TR's things in a storage locker. It does not really get rid of the things and it does not support the children being "safe somewhere else." It almost preserves evidence against them. Were they going to sell the things later? Stop paying for the locker? What were they thinking? It really ties them to the things and creates a lot of evidence- getting the locker, access to it, monthly billing, etc.
not sure how you ever completely avoid LVD or CD later trying to claim ineffective assistance of counsel- wonder if she would say that her atty told her "not to appear in Court" or that he failed to inform her of a court date or something like that. wonder if he actually has her signing documents saying that he told her about the prelim and she decided not to appear. Imagine her easily turning on an atty, IMO. Apart from that, if he used to represent her husband, even if they both agree to his representing her now, could one of them later find another document, proceeding, finding, interest, etc., and claim that it was not cured by their agreement? Does anyone think their marriage was just to avoid testifying against each other? Up until now, I imagined they had some feelings for each other, but is this entire murder extravaganza all about the $$$?
Actually, LE stated in their initial charges that Lori left behind a whole bunch of stuff in the condo unit in Rexburg when she fled to Hawaii. Would assume some of the kids stuff was there as well. I always saw the storage unit as a memento dump. BTW, this begs the question: who did she think was going to clean out her condo in Rexburg, and who ultimately did clean it out? Where did THAT stuff go????Was anyone else struck at how little "stuff" was in that locker? Since no other belongings were mentioned to be found elsewhere, I assume that was all of what JJ & Tylee had at the time of their death. Maybe it says more about me than them, but my 7-year-old and 16-year-old would have a hella more than that. And I am not a hoarder. Just clothes alone would be several boxes for each child, books, toys & hobbies, keepsakes, stuffed animals, sports equipment, etc. I know Lori moved a lot and that definitely makes you travel light. And I know "things" don't bring you happiness but to me it is a sign of the life the kids led...very few things that showed they were engage in the normal activities of life. JMO
I cannot say what the status is now, but...this is dated back in February 2020, from East Idaho News. Follow the attached link to read the whole article. Here is a snippet: “…Due to lack of payment, the storage unit and all its contents are considered abandoned. The items are being held at the business pending the outcome of a police investigation, but will ultimately be returned to extended family members…”Actually, LE stated in their initial charges that Lori left behind a whole bunch of stuff in the condo unit in Rexburg when she fled to Hawaii. Would assume some of the kids stuff was there as well. I always saw the storage unit as a memento dump. BTW, this begs the question: who did she think was going to clean out her condo in Rexburg, and who ultimately did clean it out? Where did THAT stuff go????
<Respectfully snipped for focus> I watched the entire OJ trial.
IMO, there is quite alot of evidence of ineffective counsel without Lori having to say anything at all![]()
If you just watched the OJ trial, tell me if I’m right that the prosecution never brought up the fact that wet leather shrinks when it dries, making the spectacle of OJ trying on the originally soggy leather glove found behind the pool house irrelevant. (“If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit!) That’s been bugging me for years.
If you just watched the OJ trial, tell me if I’m right that the prosecution never brought up the fact that wet leather shrinks when it dries, making the spectacle of OJ trying on the originally soggy leather glove found behind the pool house irrelevant. (“If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit!) That’s been bugging me for years.
Yes! I’m so glad I’m not the only voice howling into the wind about this. You might get lucky if you squeeze back into a wet glove while it’s still wet, or has been rewetted, then you wear the dang thing until it dries to your size. You outta luck if it’s been sitting with other evidence for over a year. Another thing to hold against the horrible prosecution team in that trial.Totally agree and have been saying the same thing since the day it happened! I worked in womens retail at the time and we all knew that leather will shrink when wet, and stretch right back out when you squeeze yourself into it. First learned about with huarache sandals in the 1970s.
I watched the whole thing and always thought that was a huge blunder. If you label something "Off Topic" are you allowed to post, or as in this case, ask a question? Because I followed the CA trial but did not know about Websleuths at the time. I tried to read through the pages for the answer to one question but never found it.Yes! I’m so glad I’m not the only voice howling into the wind about this. You might get lucky if you squeeze back into a wet glove while it’s still wet, or has been rewetted, then you wear the dang thing until it dries to your size. You outta luck if it’s been sitting with other evidence for over a year. Another thing to hold against the horrible prosecution team in that trial.
Yikes. I should have marked this Off-Topic from the get-go. My apologies.
Not if it's wholly off topicI watched the whole thing and always thought that was a huge blunder. If you label something "Off Topic" are you allowed to post, or as in this case, ask a question? Because I followed the CA trial but did not know about Websleuths at the time. I tried to read through the pages for the answer to one question but never found it.
Thanks @Tortoise!Not if it's wholly off topic
(see admin note post #10 on page 1 of this thread.)
I am not sure.. I will have to go look at the article and read it to see if I can figure it out. The only thing I can think of is because CD lived in Springville Utah at one time.@Spartygirl, that's what I would have thought but why would CourtTV even bring that up unless there was a reason to?
Here you goFrustrating - their website isn't available in Europe!