I don't think she'd meet the minimum standard for criminal insanity. She clearly understands the difference between right and wrong, is organized, and manipulative. While she has a slew of behaviours that suggest profound alteration of normal function, it isn't enough to make her not responsible. These three things should disqualify her from reduced responsibility.
My most recent list of possible symptoms or behaviours, some of which are disqualifying for her to be found incapable of being held responsible.
CD: grandiose sense of importance, fantasy world that supports ideas of grandeur, needs constant praise and attention, sense of entitlement, shameless exploitation, demeans others, infidelity, arrogant, shows remorse/grief but it may be subject to the object of remorse or reminders presence, thinks others who are alive are dead (may not actually believe this - could be fantasy not delusion), masked misogyny, accused of sexual assault, possible mythomanic, delayed visceral timing, stonewalling
LVD: religious delusions, thinks others who are alive are dead, thinks others around her have been replaced by other people, possible medical abuse of children, highly sexual, attention seeking, infidelity though may be emotional not physical - data not available about physical infidelity, unable to form real intimate relationships, knows right and wrong but disregards it, persistent lying, callous, exploitative, charming, persistent problems with the law, lack of empathy, unnecessary risk taking, possibly impulsive, consistently poor financial decisions, hostility to authourity, glib, persecuted, possibly attached to a child as a replacement spouse, jealousy of child's significant other of the same sex, no remorse notable, prefers to give away agency in exchange for being excused for dark impulses, organized, manipulative, stonewalling but might be by command from CD.
