I don't understand why Charles being shot dead didn't make police more suspicious. Our stand your ground laws should have some common sense. I understand standing your ground against a robber. But in this case, Alex wasn't even in his own home, and Charles, while not living in the home at the time, was presumably paying for it. Yet Alex was allowed to get away with "stand your ground" defense, even though per his own story, he had enough time to go to the bedroom, get his gun, go out of the bedroom and shoot Charles dead twice in the chest. Alex had a one inch scratch on the back of his head or something, that he attributed to Charles hitting him with a bat, which again to me doesn't seem like enough of an injury for him to be terrified for his life to the point that he can use lethal force.