Hi, I've been lurking here, following the Vallow/Daybell case very closely as I'm a local and know Chris Parrett & his family as acquaintances.
I have a unique perspective to this whole case as I was raised by people who believed similarly to Chad Daybell. We were not part of a splinter group, I was raised within the mainstream structure of the church.
I disagree. Those who believe this way believe they are in line with LDS doctrine. In fact, they believe it's a purer form of LDS doctrine only available to those willing to study and uncover the special mysteries god has prepared for them.
There's a book available on Amazon and there's also a free PDF on the internet. I don't think I'm allowed to link. I don't think I've seen it mentioned here. It's called "Doctrine of Eternal Lives." The author is anonymous as he/she didn't really write anything, just collected scriptures and quotes from prophets that support the idea of "reincarnation." These things are not taught openly from the pulpit or in church classrooms today.
My parents argue that these things
are still taught, but you have to listen closely to conference talks to figure out what's really being said.
I was told that the church didn't teach this doctrine anymore because the church is under condemnation as declared by President Benson.
I was taught that it wasn't "reincarnation" like the Hindus believe, but a plan of progression, building upon whatever you achieve in the previous life. So you wouldn't go backwards or be reborn randomly.
Lori's claim that she was Joseph Smith's grandmother and sealed to Moroni is pretty wild, though. My parents never made any claims like that. Although my parents thought we might be our own grandparents if you went back far enough in your family line on this world. I was also taught that we progress through the eternities, including through the three kingdoms. My father in particular claims that all of these things were once taught from the pulpit and were keystones to mormonism, though bringing up progression through the kingdoms is a great way to start a fight in gospel doctrine class at church.
My family was not the only family that believed this and taught it privately. I don't know how common this kind of belief is because it's also treated with a lot of sacred/secretness. I was told specifically not to bring any of this up in any of my church classes, nor to tell anyone (especially anyone who might be struggling) in case the knowledge that this life was not their only chance might stop them from trying to remain temple worthy.
Chris Parrett is a really interesting person. I've often wondered if he's on the spectrum somewhere as his in-person social skills are really lacking. His personality comes off as supremely smug. It feels like he is always laughing at you.
His emails to his LDS AVOW subscribers are very dramatic. All caps and lots of bolded, red text, and highlighted all over the place. When we were members of his forum it felt like they had a new date that Jesus was coming every other month. Only a slight exaggeration. When Jesus didn't come and the end times didn't begin, there were always reasons and the next date would be picked... so people stayed in a constant state of fear and anxiety.
I get the sense that he maybe doesn't buy into the end of days stuff but is truly delighted that so many others do.
I think Chris stands to benefit a lot if Chad isn't convicted or is exonerated. Chad has posited himself as basically a prophet, seer, revelator of the last days. Chris has loudly proclaimed him innocent and also claims special insider knowledge (says he was on the phone with Chad and Lori for hours). If Chad walks, there are many, many LDS AVOW members/supporters who will take this as proof of their fringe beliefs (ie Chad is being persecuted by a corrupt government, there are 'Gadianton robbers' (see Book of Mormon beliefs) trying to bring Chad down because he's teaching truth about the latter days, etc.
They don't teach it anymore. They used to, though. It wasn't ever called reincarnation. See the "Doctrine of Eternal Lives" book.
I don't know what I believe anymore, but I still think the doctrine of eternal lives has some beautiful ideas. Eternity is an awful long time. If there is a loving father/god/creator, and he truly wants us to have all that he has, cutting us off after one mortal probation with so many growing up without the gospel and leaving us
forever in a lesser kingdom, separated from our families doesn't make a lot of sense. Living forever and ever and ever in a cloudy heaven playing a harp doesn't make a lot of sense either. There's a part of me that will always rather like the idea of being born again and accumulating an eternity of different experiences. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm afraid you won't know if you come across anyone who subscribes to these "outlandish beliefs" because the secrecy is generally very high. Mysteries of the universe, dreams, and visions are often treated with the same sacredness as the temple endowment. There were lots of things my parents wouldn't talk to us about unless we were sitting in the Celestial room.
People with these beliefs will attend church with you, sit on your row, teach your RS and EQ classes, serve in your bishoprics. You'll never know.
Chad was unusual in this regard because he published his stuff and participated in these forums. My parents never would have done either of those things.
If you do unearth someone who believes this sort of thing, good luck warning them or persuading them otherwise. There are a LOT of quotes from scripture and LDS prophets to back these beliefs up, and most that ascribe to this higher-law way of thinking aren't going to listen to someone who hasn't unlocked the mysteries themselves because you are lower on the progression ladder.
If someone has been raised from birth to believe these things, the programming goes very, very deep and is very difficult to separate from mainstream teachings.
You don't get excommunicated until you've published something or have been publicly outspoken in ways that directly oppose the church's leadership. Chad's books were all fictionalized so he was able to fly under the radar in that regard. Folks who attended his signings or speaking events were already on the same page. Weirdly, if you're trying to stop child abuse within the church you will get ex'd quickly and publicly. See Bishop Sam Young.
If Chad is found guilty of breaking the law, he will likely face church discipline. But just belonging to AVOW or believing in the doctrine of eternal lives (reincarnation) won't get you ex'd. In fact you can be a Bishop, Stake Pres, High Councilman, Area Authority, Mission President etc. and have these beliefs. I have personal experience with men in my life who have been all of those things
and believe in the doctrine of eternal lives. I come from some Utah royalty, yo.
No. There's just the one mainstream church. However, no one really considers themselves "fringe" within the LDS church. They just believe themselves to be living a higher law. Even the groups that actually splinter from the mainstream church believe they are leaving to live a more pure, more true version of the restored gospel:
Latter Day Saint movement - Wikipedia
Here's the key to understanding people like Daybell: They TRULY believe they have uncovered the mysteries of the universe. They truly believe they have been given a higher light and knowledge than their peers. Money, greed, sex, may come to play a part but in the beginning, those aren't the motivating reasons. The reasons are because they were special and more righteous than most and have divine and foreordained callings to fulfill. Allll mormons believe we have divine and foreordained callings (as in missions given in the prexistence before we were born), some just believe it more hardcore than others.
My parents taught us that the reduction in teaching the eternal progression from the pulpit was to protect the main membership of the church who were not ready for these things. In the minds of my parents, the lord has "pulled back" the restored gospel so we won't be in worse condemnation for not following all of it. This lesser gospel is therefore a blessing to the LDS mainstream masses who don't have the whole truth. (The LDS church in all of its forms is very big on truth claims).
My parents also claim end days visions and dreams, and several men I've worked with have full on prophesied during staff meetings. I also know these types of men don't make up the bulk of the church.
My parents are pretty obsessed with 'near death experiences' of which there are a plethora of books and youtube videos, and my dad in particular is pretty obsessed with various end-times prophecies. As far as I know he is not a member of LDS AVOW or any other online groups (he is not very tech savvy) but researches these things on his own.
For the record, my parents haven't ever killed anyone or broken any laws, nor has anyone died mysteriously and no children have disappeared. However, I can see how someone extreme could get to the point where they might excuse such a thing, especially if they truly believed Jesus was coming in July 2020 and they had special edicts from him to prepare. In the Book of Mormon, god instructs the prophet Nephi to smite off Laban's head. God is killing one man to save a whole nation by delivering the brass plates (supposedly a record similar to the Old Testament) to Nephi's family who will then carry them across the ocean to the American continent. Our early church history is also marred with things like blood atonement and violence against people who married and had children with a black person. There's precedence if you're looking for it, yk? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Wow, this is getting way too long. I don't know how helpful this is. But if you have any questions about being raised by people who believed similarly to Chad, let me know.
since it maybe didn't carry the connotation of a homeless or jail camp (ala Arpaio's tent cities in AZ). Moo.
