The Defense filed this Memorandum in support of their Franks Motion. IANAL, but I don't think the Prosecution will file a memorandum rebutting 136 pages, they're not going to lay their case out for the Defense.
Try looking at post #736 in this thread.
And on private property, having branches that were cut with a saw is not uncommon.
Seems kinda dumb that murderers would leave "runes" that would implicate their group's involvement. Why leave a calling card at a crime scene with two dead CHILDREN from the community?Yep, I could throw a bunch of branches down like pick-up sticks, but would never consider them "runes" unless they spelled out something meaningful in accordance with the runes alphabet.
What did the runes say? Perhaps "Richard didn't do this"
Old as dirt here and kind of thought I'd seen it all, but IMO I have never seem such an unprofessional legal document.
Technically yes to both.
Agree with your scenario, but we know that RA is not blind or socially awkward. He was the helpful Pharm Tech, fun pool tournament guy at the local pub.
They pulled in LE from all over at the beginning, yeah? This person worked on the case. It's a very interesting part of the memo. From page 5 of the Memo for Franks Hearing: (3) On May 1, 2023, the State of Indiana, by way of Prosecutor Nick McCleland, received a letter from former Rushville Assistant Police Chief Todd Click, now retired.2 As stated in the previous paragraph: Click, Murphy and Ferency were three of the law enforcement officers who worked on the Delphi murder case, particularly focused on the Odinite angle as it intersected with suspects in Rushville Indiana. After reading Richard Allen’s probable cause affidavit, Click became concerned that the information contained in Richard Allen’s affidavit pointing the finger at Richard Allen was far less compelling than the totality of the information that Detective Ferency, Detective Murphy and Officer Click had accumulated during the Rushville portion of the investigation. The information that Murphy, Ferency and Click had gathered during their investigation connected men who practiced Odinism in or near Delphi with another group of men who lived in Rushville and then connected both groups of men to the murders.3 Click was concerned that for some reason the leadership of the investigative team had failed to share with Prosecutor McCleland the evidence gathered by Click, Ferency and Murphy. Click’s concerns led him to seek out a lawyer to assist him in the drafting of a letter. This letter was then sent to McCleland.4
Well, to counter this point...I'm the helpful college administrator and a blast to be around--with the people I know.
You know what? You might be right. I'm not sure whether there's an opportunity for the prosecution to file a memo opposing the Franks hearing. It may just be that an initial showing by the defense is required and then the prosecution would get to present their opposition at the actual hearing if it's granted. Maybe PrarieWind is more familiar with the procedure for these specific hearings.
www.wishtv.com
That went right over my head. I never saw it.
Jefferson Calico, a professor at the University of the Cumberlands in Kentucky, says:Religion professor breaks down Odinism and its connection to the Delphi murders
What exactly is Odinism? Richard Allen's defense attorneys thrust it into the heart of the Delphi murder case in a court filing Monday.
The defense memo implies that BH and PW picked it up while they were in the army together: "W lived in Delphi and
The defense's explanation is that Asatru/Odinism has been subverted by white nationalists, and that PW and BH were of that variety. They do seem to have been members of this racist group: Vinlanders Social Club
