FrostedGlass
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Messages
- 6,087
- Reaction score
- 29,634
I have to re-think my answer to you. It's now: I Don't Know.So, I guess my question would be, was this person reporting on the in-chambers meeting, or the courtroom portion of the 19th, when JG announced before the public that RA's attorneys had withdrawn?
The hearing on the 19th was a status hearing but apparently JG didn't consider the closed door portion to be part of that hearing. The court reporter certified she had transcribed: "all of the proceedings had at Status Hearing". Since her affidavit specifically references the status hearing I was wrong to assume she transcribed the whole meeting.
It seems like B&R would have objected to having that whole discussion off the record considering how important it was but who knows anything with this case?