Second part of things I ( and maybe you) wonder about:
A watcher/ stalker seems very unusual considering things like the bridge and the wooded area and fields, but in this day and time, people stalk and watch in diverse ways. I did read some poster comments early on that one of the girls had been on her family's property where she was supposed to be outdoors, and had reported an unusual event possibly tied to a stranger in the area. I don't know if this was ever confirmed or refuted by family members and released to the public or if it was a rumor.
I realize that the person she saw or heard may not be the perp. but it's so very strange that they'd walk upon a brazen killer who just decided to shoot them.
6)
Has any info been released about any tech. devices owned by the perp ( not the girls) or modes of transportation? I'm not sure the perp. was exactly high tech, but may have had devices other than his gun/ guns which were helpful in a less populated area ( binoculars, night scope,
maybe a phone with GPS -- knife, binding materials and so forth,but high tech like a smartphone with GPS or a hand held GPS device is way down my list for obvious reasons.)
7)
Is it believed he arrived and departed using a vehicle which would not be noticed as unusual? As I have not read any info about an unusual looking vehicle, I tend to think nothing visible seemed odd. The girls were old enough to spot " odd" .An example would be a common make and color truck which may have carried a mountain terrain bike or smaller, fairly off road motorbike in the truck bed.
8)
I've seen references to the " Bridge Guy". It's not stated as " the killer" or " the perp". Does this mean some or most of you, and/ or LE has said there was m
ore than one man on the bridge road? One who killed, one who is either innocent, a lookout or hands on accomplice to parts of the crimes.
Not that my opinion matters, but my thoughts on possible or likely traits of this killer:
I think, at this time, it was a crime of opportunity and impulsivity committed by someone who had either molested and/or killed previously as a crime of opportunity ( they were either family members or were in his immediate orbit and vulnerable for various reasons) or who knew how to find, then lure children to him from either books, movies, or having seen it done by someone close to him at one point when he was fairly young ( a parent or close relative or friend he was loyal to).
This is not to say that the families of killers are also bad people. In many cases, they are innocent, collateral victims emotionally. However, there's something about these almost simultaneous murders which steers my thoughts to a long- suppressed desire to act out a brutal fantasy with no planning, just coincidental tiny window of opportunity. Perhaps other victims were able to escape and had no identifying info or sourceable DNA present at that time in technology..
The other option is that he did stalk and choose a victim, and this time there were two young teen girls instead of one. IMO, in this case, he'd likely be a chronic offender, a person who was always in the sights of LE in his home town for petty crimes or annoyances.
The exception to the usual escalation of violence, IMO, would be a person who'd harmed others in his past, but has or came to have another person in his life who functioned as a " minder" and kept him under control most of the time. The usual and easiest way for a " minder" to control a large strong man they believe may hurt them and others is to keep them too intoxicated to leave a shared house very often. So, I'd expect chronic alcoholism to be a part of his profile. Maybe hidden well, or maybe he was known as " the town drunk" wherever he lived...
IDK if he's killed before this, or if he's killed or assaulted after the Delphi crimes. I tend to think there's a history of violent crimes based on the speed at which we believe he lured and took the girls, however I also consider the fact that he may have been an animal hunter as well:
If so, he'd know how to stalk, how to be stealthy, and how to be very still for long periods, then leap to shoot a covey of quail or flock of ducks despite his rather large size.
What sets him apart from normal, nice, ordinary weekend or opening day of a specific hunting season is that he learned from animals and something very violent and sick caused him to kill Abby and Libby, and possibly unknown others.
Hunters are not human killers, and my discussion of this possibility relates ONLY to the learned ways to stalk, remain still and patient, then spring into action rapidly.
One of the things I've always wondered about is if he traveled and has unknown dead or known missing victims scattered geographically. I wanted to look specifically at the state of Indiana and how unpopulated or populated it is. The sparsely states like Montana, Wyoming, the Dakotas, and Idaho would seem to be the grounds for a killer who exclusively preferred the hunt of a victim as prey rather than a city killer who is more of a spree killer of either a " type" of person, or any vulnerable person, or persons with material goods visible which the killer wants to possess.. More and more often, murders are linked to thefts of high priced items. Take a life to get a Rolex or Mercedes. SMDH. I know this isn't a factor here, but because of the contrasts, wanted to mention the opposite type of spree killers we read about.
Note that Indiana is as close to the middle of the list as possible. My impression of many parts of Indiana I've traveled through almost to Illinois is that there are many rural farms or fallow land with no visible homesites. I'm sure this is true for many areas of most states but could be a factor in how location plays or doesn't play a part..
Here is the source I used which ranks states by both land mass (population per square mile) and approximate total of residents.
List of states and territories of the United States by population density - Wikipedia
As you can see or probably already knew if you live in the state or adjoining areas, population density is not a state-wide factor like we'd see in Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, and the others you can read without me listing them BUT every state has rural areas here and there.
If using a statewide area and not a more localized area, this is not a factor in the Delphi crimes as far as can be determined by population density of the state. I do think the area was regionally close to his home base..
Thank you so much in advance for your input and theories to the questions I've asked, or known facts I don't have at present. I've read enough to have a theory, but I MAY have missed info given in one or more of the 86 (!!!) previous, very dedicated threads.
If anyone has other case info, feel free to add it. I asked what I'm not sure of, but it's definitely not all- inclusive.
I sincerely hope everyone of us can see justice for Abby and Libby's families and the community before long. I hope there will be answers for all of us here and the LE officers who have spent time researching, looking at topography, maps, roads or trails, and especially the minute details of the sketch of " Bridge Guy".