Wow, it is really Opposite Day for me in here
Let me ask you guys this, for all of you who think he hasn’t killed before, do you think he’s a younger perp? Because IF you believe him to be older, then perhaps you might not be as inclined to think he hasn’t killed before?
I think a lot of my speculations come from the fact that I believe him to be older. Today I think he’s 48. That’s my age of the day, if he was around 45 at the time of the killings.
(Ha that’s not even in LE’s age range of 18-40)
Listening to the audio again:
ABIGAIL WILLIAMS | Federal Bureau of Investigation
Ok, “guys” now sounds to me like it could be younger, but “DTH” still sounds older to me.
I’ve mentioned this before but nobody seemed interested lol - I really do wonder if there’s some sort of unnatural audio frequency which is a result of the processing on the audio file. For instance, if a filter is used to clean up or enhance the voice, perhaps there is an element of the original sample which is lost, or an artifact on the frequency that is added. This happens imo with digital remastering of classic albums. Sometimes it can really change a frequency, or element, which is why sometimes I like the original albums better than the remastered versions.
Obviously LE would have had their top professionals work on the audio file, and they would get it to a point to where they think it’s the cleanest. But I hear possibly some sort of “filter effect” on the voice which is a throatiness, or garbling, sorry don’t know the word, which to me is indicating an older sound to the voice. Perhaps it’s the movement which gives that effect that I’m hearing, or maybe it is in fact an accurate representation of his voice’s true frequency and tone.
I would like to know if the original audio sample retains the exact same tonality as the released clip, pre-processing—think of this like a digital image—sometimes when you go to clear it up, certain original elements may be not be retained.
I’m assuming it’s top notch professionals who worked on the audio file so maybe it is completely accurate without any effects or Bi-product acoustical elements.
Do we know if the audio was directly just cut and released in its original form, or was there a filter/effect run through it...was it copied? Even a slight filter could make a difference, moo. Has the audio file retained all its original qualities?