Prime8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2022
- Messages
- 387
- Reaction score
- 4,128
I was under the impression that AW heard the audio herself, as well as saw the video (more than the few seconds released to the public) of the girls as BG was approaching them. She wrote her first hand experience down and that's what was shared. I don't understand why that would change it being the first hand account of AW? History books and archives are full of written first hand accounts that stand as fact and reference.
I do understand it's not LE offically telling the public something. It is though, IMO, a mother of a victim giving us her first hand account of evidence she experienced.
Please don't think I want to argue, I truly don't. We just don't agree and that's alright. I appreciate your thoughts, your views.
Yes, I know. I'm not trying to be argumentative but I do think it's important for everyone to separate fact from speculation. Do I think what GH says it true? Probably. AW gave a first-hand account to GH (if she's going on what she heard/saw and not what LE said). Publications/books/archives are supposed to be vetted, meaning there should be tangible proof/corroboration of the first-hand account. That's why going to a peer-reviewed publication for scientific information is better than hearing about it through a friend of a friend who knows some doctor on Facebook - there are standards to that publication. GH isn't vetted by anyone, he's not accountable to anyone, he doesn't have direct proof of the info he's sharing. WS "vetting" him doesn't mean anything either because we don't have a way to vet WS. If we watched the video/audio, we would have first-hand information. If GH watched it and we had some sort of confirmation of that, we would be getting his first-hand account and it would be second-hand info to us. Throw in AW telling GH of her first-hand account, we're getting the information after it's passed through multiple people and like the game of telephone, things can be misconstrued. And it's honestly super simple to change the wording when presenting these things to change it - "GH claims to have first-hand information from AW that on the video, this is what was said." vs. "The girls said this in the video. Here's my proof."