D
Deleted member 155000
Guest
Because it's a small town in a mostly rural county. They likely have routinely given offenders like RL a pass...in the past. Now all of this is front and center and they simply have to do what the law requires.
There is nothing else going on with him, IMO.
He is not BG and IMO not involved in the murders. Could the actual murderer have been in one of his outbuildings? Sure, but I doubt it.
If I had the power, I would erase any reference to RL from these threads. But there is nothing else to be sleuthed, so round and round we go.
Ultimately I believe RL will be totally cleared by LE but there will always be people claiming otherwise, even if/when someone else is charged.
RL is not a saint. He makes really bad decisions but I don't believe murder was one of them.
At least in a court of law, RL would be able to defend himself...not so in the social media court of opinion.
The photo LE thought would bring this to a quick close has failed.
Perhaps this is why:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1201335/The-eyes-recognising-know.html
"Our brain looks at a person's eyes first to identify a face, according to a study. It found the brain tries to obtain the maximum amount of information possible from a face, get vital information from, firstly someone's eyes, then the shape of their mouth and, thirdly, their nose "
End of rant. Back to lurking.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
The point of websleuths is to sleuth. If we removed all mentions of the person whose property the girls were found on, who investigators were looking at to clear or connect to the case, who inserted himself into the case, who gave a "fish shopping" alibi but was at a recycle center, who has a known alcohol problem and a past protection order against him...well, we wouldn't be very good sleuths.
I understand why people caution against jumping to conclusions with RL. I myself hold him as having "probable" but not certain involvement, but I am open to the likelihood an alternative person may be responsible if evidence is revealed to suggest that.
But whenever I read someone who just wants to clear RL altogether, despite FBI/LE issuing a probable cause SW...to be honest, it comes off as...both bias and unrealistic. Imho.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk