kittymittons
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2017
- Messages
- 751
- Reaction score
- 20
No. 3pm ET hearing today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you!
No. 3pm ET hearing today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hate to be that guy, butttttt,
anymore word on RL? I haven't been following these threads lately just because of the lack of new info.
I am interested in this bit that says a neighbour found the girls within minutes. Do you have a link for this please Dee?:thinking: How would we know? FBI was on scene early Tues. They are called in for abductions. The divers searched a portion of the Creek. The dogs were released. But a neighbor, I assume other searchers may have been with him, discovered the girls within a very few minutes after the volunteers were released to search the trails.
Just for the record, they (the transfer station) are not just for recycling, they take trash. Some things you wouldn't want to recycle...So, part of his probation violations was for a trip to the Carroll County Transfer Station on (or about) 2/13/17.
I wonder why he needed to go to the transfer station?
Recycling pick up was scheduled for the 14th, fwiw.
Just for the record, they are not just for recycling, they take trash. Some things you wouldn't want to recycle...
You're so right. There is no shadow.
IMO they could have deleted the dog.
Thank you. I thought the shadows were off. Do you have an opinion if BG was inserted to make it appear he was on the bridge? The feet/shoes look a bit off to me. TIA
Just for the record, they (the transfer station) are not just for recycling, they take trash. Some things you wouldn't want to recycle...
Same as a human, stepping on planks only. They've deleted something as there is no shadow.Deleted a dog?
A dog?how does a dog walk that bridge?
So, part of his probation violations was for a trip to the Carroll County Transfer Station on (or about) 2/13/17.
No mention of his supposed trip to Lafayette that day. Why?
1) He didn't go
2) That have no evidence to prove that he did
3) He got a lift from someone, so no violation
Hrm.
I wonder why he needed to go to the transfer station?
Recycling pick up was scheduled for the 14th, fwiw.
http://www.cityofdelphi.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=422&Itemid=322
I find it hard to believe this is the first time he has violated those 3 specific terms of his probation. It's a small enough town. I'm sure local PD are quite well aware of him, based on his history. I would be stunned to hear that no one has seen his vehicle around since 2014, or that he has never been spotted at a local watering hole prior to 2/13/17. Was it necessary to get him out of the way for a bit? *shrugs* I'm torn on this.
Same as a human, stepping on planks only. They've deleted something as there is no shadow.
Thank you. We did talk about it in earlier threads, that LE may have erased and the cloned areas of possibly other individuals or just one other individual being present around or next to the POI/BG. However, I could not understand the patchy cloudiness all over including the top of the picture, just like you pointed it out too. It is possible, that we are looking at a combination of artifacts and cloning.
I am therefore inclined to believe, that Abby may have been indeed close to the POI/BG in this frame prior to taking her out of the picture.
-Nin
So why do you think there is no shadow of BG in that pic?A dog would be crucial to helping someone in the public identity BG. If he had a dog with him, I doubt LE would purposely crop that out. JMO.
Agree - People are more likely to recognise the dog than the BG!A dog would be crucial to helping someone in the public identity BG. If he had a dog with him, I doubt LE would purposely crop that out. JMO.
So why do you think there is no shadow of BG in that pic?
Agree. And the cloning not only of the shadow (D) but the area (C) behind where the shadow should be suggests she might already be prone (not deceased, of course, but knocked down perhaps by a blow to the head). Other cloning around the right hand might have served to disguise a weapon (baton, etc.). To attack on the bridge, if that's what happened, is really blatant, increasing the risk of being seen. It might also raise the odds of two attackers, since getting an injured person down the hill would be more difficult.
If u look at Abby's photo she looks superimposed too esp her sneakers it looks like she was just stuck there, this was all mentioned before. First thread I believe.I have thought for a long time that suspect was walking some place else on the trail/bridge. The image released even from a frame of video just seems to have the appearance of a bad copy/crop & paste. Jmo
From the beginning I noticed "person of interest" has no shadow. I hope that did not hinder an arrest from the onset. Jmo
In reference to suspects raised right foot, it's as if he is stepping over something yet nothing is there. Jmo
If u look at Abby's photo she looks superimposed too esp her sneakers it looks like she was just stuck there, this was all mentioned before. First thread I believe.